What will you tell me, North America, about Trump? – I guess that he is trying to strengthen the U.S. economy, territorial potential, NATO, or that he is not there to defend others – or democracies at all, at least NATO ones? I guess not.
[ And there are facts that Ukrainian democracy, defending the values of democracy, independence, freedom against totalitarian – authoritarian, aggressive – criminal, anti-freedom Russia or its Putin – regarding the democratic values of fundamental rights of citizens, not only probably of neighboring countries, which, by persecuting state (regarding its power structures), innocent in their aspirations or rights, about democratic values of people, such as the right to equality before the law or basic freedoms, such as the right to self-determination, to life, freedom of choice (at least with regard to international laws or, for example, the Charter of Human and Civil Rights), in logical scopes, i.e. legally justified, therefore consistent with the only sufficiently justified law(s) [ the author presents, communicates logically, and in a definitional manner about this law, about such rights in his first article entitled: „On Law and Rights in General …”, to which he refers, recommends familiarization due to its short general comprehensiveness and rather easy access to the essential basics.]
[Regarding, in the context of the European part of the NATO alliance, Ukraine also protects pre-spatially, remotely from sabotage, etc. from Russia, which is actually an aggressor against the definitionally ascertainable democratic rights and life and freedom as the innate rights of every person, citizen in the world.]
It seems that Trump himself (regarding his status (but also legal obligations in the sense of legitimate (legal) law) permitted, as president betrays (submits to Russia) the nature of NATO’s basic definitional independence (he is after all the head of the US army), threatening to subject NATO to the implementation of influence contrary to NATO principles, accessibility for Putin’s totalitarian-regime categories, which NATO (part of democracy) is supposed to fight or protect against!
For now, it looks like Trump was elected president, but North America is not officially, legally, after all, a country, a totalitarian-authoritarian state!
For now, it looks like Trump is opening up for Putin the „entrance” to the salons of officially democratic, „Western” countries, i.e. a criminal, a war executioner in terms of logical, definitional law may have a fraudulent status, logically false, but formally existing status: „a statesman and as a legal representative of Russia of a supposedly legal or actually existing democratic state. In this, Trump exposes Ukraine to legalization or an attempt to legalize/tolerate on the part of the „West” the theft, loss of Ukrainian lands and somehow strengthening this usurpatory-totalitarian, essentially criminal regime. to make important voices, movements of people in the United States, (including discussions, analyses, etc.), also for their president still, to revise both the situation and Trump’s actions regarding the significance and presented in the articles (materials) legal rights in general and regarding the situation, and also to move the thinking of both Putin and his entourage and people throughout Russia (also in other countries) in order to take into account possible revisions, regarding the material and context/contexts.
It is probably necessary to articulate that Trump has no right to fleece or expose Ukraine to losses, counting on strengthening the USA at its expense, debating with Putin and allowing him to the „salons of the West”!, nor to give the appearance or attempts to pretend the legality of such totalitarian-bandit categories or results of such actions. As for China, maybe it is possible to consider that although China is formally a country, a regime-authoritarian state, undemocratic in its power structure, nevertheless, leaving aside its internal structural structure, its external policy should be taken into account, i.e. towards other countries, and here, for example, Taiwan is certainly concerned with its rights to democratic rights in opposition, opposition or security regarding the authoritarianism, also totalitarianism of the Chinese system. – [definitions, logical justifications, evidence of truthfulness were included by the writer in his article posted on this website entitled: „On Law and Rights in General…”.]
he is the boss, the head of an authoritarian-totalitarian system, de facto criminal-criminal (e.g. from the perspective of international law. Maybe check people, US citizens, whether Trump is not misappropriating the values of NATO and democracy, after all Putin’s ego), as various details, existing facts indicate, and Putin was isolated by the „Western” countries, democratic (democratic principles), etc. until Trump.
For now, it looks like Trump is opening for Putin „entrance” to the salons of officially democratic, „Western” countries, i.e. a criminal, a war executioner in terms of logical, definitional law (including international (the Hague counts), democratic may have a fraudulent status, logically false, but formally existing status: „a statesman and as a legal representative of Russia, an allegedly legal or actually existing democratic state.
In this, Trump exposes Ukraine to legalization or an attempt to legalize or tolerate on the part of the „West” the theft, loss of lands Ukrainian and somehow strengthening this usurper-totalitarian, essentially criminal regime. With such action, Trump also weakens his NATO allies in Europe, also formally democratic, and additionally allied to defend democratic values, or at least co-allies with NATO!
Since Russia should not have attacked democratic Ukraine (there was also an obligation of Russia not to attack Ukraine, which they broke, despite the fact that Ukraine fulfilled the condition to give up nuclear weapons!), Trump does not have/had no right to suggest even to Ukraine or to Ukraine that it is acceptable for Ukraine to lose its share in favor of Russia after attacking its living, fairly recently established, just and democratic statehood.
So the negotiations logically and legally cannot be trade, a game between Trump and Putin, etc., but they refer to the issue of Ukraine’s rights in the sense of international law, in the sense of logical law by definition, which is the only legal one! Trump has no right to dominate Ukraine commercially, e.g. the trade agreement with Ukraine cannot be a political and legal subject in decisions regarding legal, i.e. legitimate rights of democratic Ukraine to its independence, nor does Trump have the right to stand above Zelensky regarding the definitional law, he can only protect him, support him, possibly stand, accompany him as part of the guard, security of Zelensky, his rights regarding Putin’s talks with Zelensky.
The author thinks, assumes, encourages to / that raising voices, publicizing these contents, reservations, can arouse, strengthen, inspire the content of the author’s first article entitled: „About Law and Rights in General…” contained on this website.
In order to arouse, provoke or stimulate important content, voices, movements of people in the United States, (including discussions, analyses, etc.), also for their president still, to revise both the situation and Trump’s actions regarding the importance and presented in the articles (materials) of the author of this article, legal rights in general and regarding the situation, and also to somehow move the thinking of Putin and his entourage and people throughout Russia (also in other countries) for the purposes of taking into account, considering possible revisions, regarding the material and context / contexts, the author communicates, informs that he has formulated in his materials on his website and invites you to familiarize yourself with the articles formulated by him in his several existing on the author’s website (https://bryzy2.com), having as a goal, intention, purpose the possibility of recognizing and popularizing the functioning of a beneficial, only legal law in fact, about which the author generally logically demonstrates, regarding the content as briefly, as much as he could essentially, synthetically. ____________
[( historically, logically and in terms of definition – as far as the author knows, has read – Ukraine has been a fact for a long time, and the Muscovite state was clearly established, much later than the Principality of Kiev probably existed, and the Muscovite state was not identical with the Kievan Rus, this also concerned a different population (even with some natural contacts, connections earlier – because neighboring, „not so distant” areas, but it was a different population than the Kievan, „Muscovites” called themselves „Russians” in distinction from „Rusyns”.]
[ In his first article: „On Law and Laws in General …, the author of this article demonstrates the importance of the legality of logical, logical-definitional law for the nature of man, for the nature of the entire species or human kind in a way that cannot be logically undermined and communicates in it about the scopes and possibilities for the species or human kind fundamentally, as well as about the nature of the legal obligation of a law that is beneficial to all people, for the entire species or human kind, and therefore also logically, definitionally formulated regarding the criterion of truth logically, which indicates, presents the essential, fundamental nature of the legal and only beneficial in essence, definitionally, also ultimately regarding the logical critical logical reason, which is just and to that with the category of truth, regarding logical conformity with truth. for all people, representatives of the species or human kind.
The author of this article states that such messages (information, data) as the author’s article indicated above: „On Law and Rights in General…” should not be turned a blind eye by North America, or Russia, or, for that matter, any person, citizen, who is able to think in a basic democratic, logical way. The article mentioned above: „On Law and Rights in General…” contains the basic significance, the importance of the material contained in the article regarding the content, scope/ranges of the legality of law, rights in general, which in fact, most generally, is most beneficial for people, is beneficial for people in the dimension of the entire species or human kind. [ In his first article: „On Law and Laws in General …, the author of this article demonstrates the importance of the legality of logical, logical-definitional law for the nature of man, for the nature of the entire species or human kind in a way that cannot be logically undermined and communicates in it about the scopes and possibilities for the species or human kind fundamentally, as well as about the nature of the legal obligation of a law that is beneficial to all people, for the entire species or human kind, and therefore also logically, definitionally formulated regarding the criterion of truth logically, which indicates, presents the essential, fundamental nature of the legal and only beneficial in essence, definitionally, also ultimately regarding the logical critical logical reason, which is just and to that with the category of truth, regarding logical conformity with truth. for all people, representatives of the species or human kind.
The author of this article states that such messages (information, data) as the author’s article indicated above: „On Law and Rights in General…” should not be turned a blind eye by North America, or Russia, or, for that matter, any person, citizen who is able to think in a basic democratic, logical way. The article mentioned above contains the basic significance, importance of the material contained in the article regarding the content, scope/ranges of the legality of law, rights in general, which in fact, most generally, is most beneficial to people, is beneficial to people in the dimension of the entire species or human kind.
What will you tell me, North America, about Trump? – I guess that he is trying to strengthen the U.S. economy, territorial potential, NATO, or that he is not there to defend others – or democracies at all, at least NATO ones? I guess not.
[ And there are facts that Ukrainian democracy, defending the values of democracy, independence, freedom against totalitarian – authoritarian, aggressive – criminal, anti-freedom Russia or its Putin – regarding the democratic values of fundamental rights of citizens, not only probably of neighboring countries, which, by persecuting state (regarding its power structures), innocent in their aspirations or rights, about democratic values of people, such as the right to equality before the law or basic freedoms, such as the right to self-determination, to life, freedom of choice (at least with regard to international laws or, for example, the Charter of Human and Civil Rights), in logical scopes, i.e. legally justified, therefore consistent with the only sufficiently justified law(s) [ the author presents, communicates logically, and in a definitional manner about this law, about such rights in his first article entitled: „On Law and Rights in General …”, to which he refers, recommends familiarization due to its short general comprehensiveness and rather easy access to the essential basics.]
[Regarding, in the context of the European part of the NATO alliance, Ukraine also protects pre-spatially, remotely from sabotage, etc. from Russia, which is actually an aggressor against the definitionally ascertainable democratic rights and life and freedom as the innate rights of every person, citizen in the world.]
It seems that Trump himself (regarding his status (but also legal obligations in the sense of legitimate (legal) law) permitted, as president betrays (submits to Russia) the nature of NATO’s basic definitional independence (he is after all the head of the US army), threatening to subject NATO to the implementation of influence contrary to NATO principles, accessibility for Putin’s totalitarian-regime categories, which NATO (part of democracy) is supposed to fight or protect against!
For now, it looks like Trump was elected president, but North America is not officially, legally, after all, a country, a totalitarian-authoritarian state!
For now, it looks like Trump is opening up for Putin the „entrance” to the salons of officially democratic, „Western” countries, i.e. a criminal, a war executioner in terms of logical, definitional law may have a fraudulent status, logically false, but formally existing status: „a statesman and as a legal representative of Russia of a supposedly legal or actually existing democratic state. In this, Trump exposes Ukraine to legalization or an attempt to legalize/tolerate on the part of the „West” the theft, loss of Ukrainian lands and somehow strengthening this usurpatory-totalitarian, essentially criminal regime. to make important voices, movements of people in the United States, (including discussions, analyses, etc.), also for their president still, to revise both the situation and Trump’s actions regarding the significance and presented in the articles (materials) legal rights in general and regarding the situation, and also to move the thinking of both Putin and his entourage and people throughout Russia (also in other countries) in order to take into account possible revisions, regarding the material and context/contexts.
It is probably necessary to articulate that Trump has no right to fleece or expose Ukraine to losses, counting on strengthening the USA at its expense, debating with Putin and allowing him to the „salons of the West”!, nor to give the appearance or attempts to pretend the legality of such totalitarian-bandit categories or results of such actions. As for China, maybe it is possible to consider that although China is formally a country, a regime-authoritarian state, undemocratic in its power structure, nevertheless, leaving aside its internal structural structure, its external policy should be taken into account, i.e. towards other countries, and here, for example, Taiwan is certainly concerned with its rights to democratic rights in opposition, opposition or security regarding the authoritarianism, also totalitarianism of the Chinese system. – [definitions, logical justifications, evidence of truthfulness were included by the writer in his article posted on this website entitled: „On Law and Rights in General…”.]
he is the boss, the head of an authoritarian-totalitarian system, de facto criminal-criminal (e.g. from the perspective of international law. Maybe check people, US citizens, whether Trump is not misappropriating the values of NATO and democracy, after all Putin’s ego), as various details, existing facts indicate, and Putin was isolated by the „Western” countries, democratic (democratic principles), etc. until Trump.
For now, it looks like Trump is opening for Putin „entrance” to the salons of officially democratic, „Western” countries, i.e. a criminal, a war executioner in terms of logical, definitional law (including international (the Hague counts), democratic may have a fraudulent status, logically false, but formally existing status: „a statesman and as a legal representative of Russia, an allegedly legal or actually existing democratic state.
In this, Trump exposes Ukraine to legalization or an attempt to legalize or tolerate on the part of the „West” the theft, loss of lands Ukrainian and somehow strengthening this usurper-totalitarian, essentially criminal regime. With such action, Trump also weakens his NATO allies in Europe, also formally democratic, and additionally allied to defend democratic values, or at least co-allies with NATO!
Since Russia should not have attacked democratic Ukraine (there was also an obligation of Russia not to attack Ukraine, which they broke, despite the fact that Ukraine fulfilled the condition to give up nuclear weapons!), Trump does not have/had no right to suggest even to Ukraine or to Ukraine that it is acceptable for Ukraine to lose its share in favor of Russia after attacking its living, fairly recently established, just and democratic statehood.
So the negotiations logically and legally cannot be trade, a game between Trump and Putin, etc., but they refer to the issue of Ukraine’s rights in the sense of international law, in the sense of logical law by definition, which is the only legal one! Trump has no right to dominate Ukraine commercially, e.g. the trade agreement with Ukraine cannot be a political and legal subject in decisions regarding legal, i.e. legitimate rights of democratic Ukraine to its independence, nor does Trump have the right to stand above Zelensky regarding the definitional law, he can only protect him, support him, possibly stand, accompany him as part of the guard, security of Zelensky, his rights regarding Putin’s talks with Zelensky.
The author thinks, assumes, encourages to / that raising voices, publicizing these contents, reservations, can arouse, strengthen, inspire the content of the author’s first article entitled: „About Law and Rights in General…” contained on this website.
In order to arouse, provoke or stimulate important content, voices, movements of people in the United States, (including discussions, analyses, etc.), also for their president still, to revise both the situation and Trump’s actions regarding the importance and presented in the articles (materials) of the author of this article, legal rights in general and regarding the situation, and also to somehow move the thinking of Putin and his entourage and people throughout Russia (also in other countries) for the purposes of taking into account, considering possible revisions, regarding the material and context / contexts, the author communicates, informs that he has formulated in his materials on his website and invites you to familiarize yourself with the articles formulated by him in his several existing on the author’s website (https://bryzy2.com), having as a goal, intention, purpose the possibility of recognizing and popularizing the functioning of a beneficial, only legal law in fact, about which the author generally logically demonstrates, regarding the content as briefly, as much as he could essentially, synthetically. ____________
[( historically, logically and in terms of definition – as far as the author knows, has read – Ukraine has been a fact for a long time, and the Muscovite state was clearly established, much later than the Principality of Kiev probably existed, and the Muscovite state was not identical with the Kievan Rus, this also concerned a different population (even with some natural contacts, connections earlier – because neighboring, „not so distant” areas, but it was a different population than the Kievan, „Muscovites” called themselves „Russians” in distinction from „Rusyns”.]
[ In his first article: „On Law and Laws in General …, the author of this article demonstrates the importance of the legality of logical, logical-definitional law for the nature of man, for the nature of the entire species or human kind in a way that cannot be logically undermined and communicates in it about the scopes and possibilities for the species or human kind fundamentally, as well as about the nature of the legal obligation of a law that is beneficial to all people, for the entire species or human kind, and therefore also logically, definitionally formulated regarding the criterion of truth logically, which indicates, presents the essential, fundamental nature of the legal and only beneficial in essence, definitionally, also ultimately regarding the logical critical logical reason, which is just and to that with the category of truth, regarding logical conformity with truth. for all people, representatives of the species or human kind.
The author of this article states that such messages (information, data) as the author’s article indicated above: „On Law and Rights in General…” should not be turned a blind eye by North America, or Russia, or, for that matter, any person, citizen, who is able to think in a basic democratic, logical way. The article mentioned above: „On Law and Rights in General…” contains the basic significance, the importance of the material contained in the article regarding the content, scope/ranges of the legality of law, rights in general, which in fact, most generally, is most beneficial for people, is beneficial for people in the dimension of the entire species or human kind. [ In his first article: „On Law and Laws in General …, the author of this article demonstrates the importance of the legality of logical, logical-definitional law for the nature of man, for the nature of the entire species or human kind in a way that cannot be logically undermined and communicates in it about the scopes and possibilities for the species or human kind fundamentally, as well as about the nature of the legal obligation of a law that is beneficial to all people, for the entire species or human kind, and therefore also logically, definitionally formulated regarding the criterion of truth logically, which indicates, presents the essential, fundamental nature of the legal and only beneficial in essence, definitionally, also ultimately regarding the logical critical logical reason, which is just and to that with the category of truth, regarding logical conformity with truth. for all people, representatives of the species or human kind.
The author of this article states that such messages (information, data) as the author’s article indicated above: „On Law and Rights in General…” should not be turned a blind eye by North America, or Russia, or, for that matter, any person, citizen who is able to think in a basic democratic, logical way. The article mentioned above contains the basic significance, importance of the material contained in the article regarding the content, scope/ranges of the legality of law, rights in general, which in fact, most generally, is most beneficial to people, is beneficial to people in the dimension of the entire species or human kind.
What will you tell me, North America, about Trump? – I guess that he is trying to strengthen the U.S. economy, territorial potential, NATO, or that he is not there to defend others – or democracies at all, at least NATO ones? I guess not.
[ And there are facts that Ukrainian democracy, defending the values of democracy, independence, freedom against totalitarian – authoritarian, aggressive – criminal, anti-freedom Russia or its Putin – regarding the democratic values of fundamental rights of citizens, not only probably of neighboring countries, which, by persecuting state (regarding its power structures), innocent in their aspirations or rights, about democratic values of people, such as the right to equality before the law or basic freedoms, such as the right to self-determination, to life, freedom of choice (at least with regard to international laws or, for example, the Charter of Human and Civil Rights), in logical scopes, i.e. legally justified, therefore consistent with the only sufficiently justified law(s) [ the author presents, communicates logically, and in a definitional manner about this law, about such rights in his first article entitled: „On Law and Rights in General …”, to which he refers, recommends familiarization due to its short general comprehensiveness and rather easy access to the essential basics.]
[Regarding, in the context of the European part of the NATO alliance, Ukraine also protects pre-spatially, remotely from sabotage, etc. from Russia, which is actually an aggressor against the definitionally ascertainable democratic rights and life and freedom as the innate rights of every person, citizen in the world.]
It seems that Trump himself (regarding his status (but also legal obligations in the sense of legitimate (legal) law) permitted, as president betrays (submits to Russia) the nature of NATO’s basic definitional independence (he is after all the head of the US army), threatening to subject NATO to the implementation of influence contrary to NATO principles, accessibility for Putin’s totalitarian-regime categories, which NATO (part of democracy) is supposed to fight or protect against!
For now, it looks like Trump was elected president, but North America is not officially, legally, after all, a country, a totalitarian-authoritarian state!
For now, it looks like Trump is opening up for Putin the „entrance” to the salons of officially democratic, „Western” countries, i.e. a criminal, a war executioner in terms of logical, definitional law may have a fraudulent status, logically false, but formally existing status: „a statesman and as a legal representative of Russia of a supposedly legal or actually existing democratic state. In this, Trump exposes Ukraine to legalization or an attempt to legalize/tolerate on the part of the „West” the theft, loss of Ukrainian lands and somehow strengthening this usurpatory-totalitarian, essentially criminal regime. to make important voices, movements of people in the United States, (including discussions, analyses, etc.), also for their president still, to revise both the situation and Trump’s actions regarding the significance and presented in the articles (materials) legal rights in general and regarding the situation, and also to move the thinking of both Putin and his entourage and people throughout Russia (also in other countries) in order to take into account possible revisions, regarding the material and context/contexts.
It is probably necessary to articulate that Trump has no right to fleece or expose Ukraine to losses, counting on strengthening the USA at its expense, debating with Putin and allowing him to the „salons of the West”!, nor to give the appearance or attempts to pretend the legality of such totalitarian-bandit categories or results of such actions. As for China, maybe it is possible to consider that although China is formally a country, a regime-authoritarian state, undemocratic in its power structure, nevertheless, leaving aside its internal structural structure, its external policy should be taken into account, i.e. towards other countries, and here, for example, Taiwan is certainly concerned with its rights to democratic rights in opposition, opposition or security regarding the authoritarianism, also totalitarianism of the Chinese system. – [definitions, logical justifications, evidence of truthfulness were included by the writer in his article posted on this website entitled: „On Law and Rights in General…”.]
he is the boss, the head of an authoritarian-totalitarian system, de facto criminal-criminal (e.g. from the perspective of international law. Maybe check people, US citizens, whether Trump is not misappropriating the values of NATO and democracy, after all Putin’s ego), as various details, existing facts indicate, and Putin was isolated by the „Western” countries, democratic (democratic principles), etc. until Trump.
For now, it looks like Trump is opening for Putin „entrance” to the salons of officially democratic, „Western” countries, i.e. a criminal, a war executioner in terms of logical, definitional law (including international (the Hague counts), democratic may have a fraudulent status, logically false, but formally existing status: „a statesman and as a legal representative of Russia, an allegedly legal or actually existing democratic state.
In this, Trump exposes Ukraine to legalization or an attempt to legalize or tolerate on the part of the „West” the theft, loss of lands Ukrainian and somehow strengthening this usurper-totalitarian, essentially criminal regime. With such action, Trump also weakens his NATO allies in Europe, also formally democratic, and additionally allied to defend democratic values, or at least co-allies with NATO!
Since Russia should not have attacked democratic Ukraine (there was also an obligation of Russia not to attack Ukraine, which they broke, despite the fact that Ukraine fulfilled the condition to give up nuclear weapons!), Trump does not have/had no right to suggest even to Ukraine or to Ukraine that it is acceptable for Ukraine to lose its share in favor of Russia after attacking its living, fairly recently established, just and democratic statehood.
So the negotiations logically and legally cannot be trade, a game between Trump and Putin, etc., but they refer to the issue of Ukraine’s rights in the sense of international law, in the sense of logical law by definition, which is the only legal one! Trump has no right to dominate Ukraine commercially, e.g. the trade agreement with Ukraine cannot be a political and legal subject in decisions regarding legal, i.e. legitimate rights of democratic Ukraine to its independence, nor does Trump have the right to stand above Zelensky regarding the definitional law, he can only protect him, support him, possibly stand, accompany him as part of the guard, security of Zelensky, his rights regarding Putin’s talks with Zelensky.
The author thinks, assumes, encourages to / that raising voices, publicizing these contents, reservations, can arouse, strengthen, inspire the content of the author’s first article entitled: „About Law and Rights in General…” contained on this website.
In order to arouse, provoke or stimulate important content, voices, movements of people in the United States, (including discussions, analyses, etc.), also for their president still, to revise both the situation and Trump’s actions regarding the importance and presented in the articles (materials) of the author of this article, legal rights in general and regarding the situation, and also to somehow move the thinking of Putin and his entourage and people throughout Russia (also in other countries) for the purposes of taking into account, considering possible revisions, regarding the material and context / contexts, the author communicates, informs that he has formulated in his materials on his website and invites you to familiarize yourself with the articles formulated by him in his several existing on the author’s website (https://bryzy2.com), having as a goal, intention, purpose the possibility of recognizing and popularizing the functioning of a beneficial, only legal law in fact, about which the author generally logically demonstrates, regarding the content as briefly, as much as he could essentially, synthetically. ____________
[( historically, logically and in terms of definition – as far as the author knows, has read – Ukraine has been a fact for a long time, and the Muscovite state was clearly established, much later than the Principality of Kiev probably existed, and the Muscovite state was not identical with the Kievan Rus, this also concerned a different population (even with some natural contacts, connections earlier – because neighboring, „not so distant” areas, but it was a different population than the Kievan, „Muscovites” called themselves „Russians” in distinction from „Rusyns”.]
[ In his first article: „On Law and Laws in General …, the author of this article demonstrates the importance of the legality of logical, logical-definitional law for the nature of man, for the nature of the entire species or human kind in a way that cannot be logically undermined and communicates in it about the scopes and possibilities for the species or human kind fundamentally, as well as about the nature of the legal obligation of a law that is beneficial to all people, for the entire species or human kind, and therefore also logically, definitionally formulated regarding the criterion of truth logically, which indicates, presents the essential, fundamental nature of the legal and only beneficial in essence, definitionally, also ultimately regarding the logical critical logical reason, which is just and to that with the category of truth, regarding logical conformity with truth. for all people, representatives of the species or human kind.
The author of this article states that such messages (information, data) as the author’s article indicated above: „On Law and Rights in General…” should not be turned a blind eye by North America, or Russia, or, for that matter, any person, citizen, who is able to think in a basic democratic, logical way. The article mentioned above: „On Law and Rights in General…” contains the basic significance, the importance of the material contained in the article regarding the content, scope/ranges of the legality of law, rights in general, which in fact, most generally, is most beneficial for people, is beneficial for people in the dimension of the entire species or human kind. [ In his first article: „On Law and Laws in General …, the author of this article demonstrates the importance of the legality of logical, logical-definitional law for the nature of man, for the nature of the entire species or human kind in a way that cannot be logically undermined and communicates in it about the scopes and possibilities for the species or human kind fundamentally, as well as about the nature of the legal obligation of a law that is beneficial to all people, for the entire species or human kind, and therefore also logically, definitionally formulated regarding the criterion of truth logically, which indicates, presents the essential, fundamental nature of the legal and only beneficial in essence, definitionally, also ultimately regarding the logical critical logical reason, which is just and to that with the category of truth, regarding logical conformity with truth. for all people, representatives of the species or human kind.
The author of this article states that such messages (information, data) as the author’s article indicated above: „On Law and Rights in General…” should not be turned a blind eye by North America, or Russia, or, for that matter, any person, citizen who is able to think in a basic democratic, logical way. The article mentioned above contains the basic significance, importance of the material contained in the article regarding the content, scope/ranges of the legality of law, rights in general, which in fact, most generally, is most beneficial to people, is beneficial to people in the dimension of the entire species or human kind.
MM