The author of this post aims to draw attention to the conflicts, ambiguities, and legal distortions in some countries regarding international relations, drawing attention to a crucial factor concerning people, their lives, and their values, which determines the foundations and ultimate possibilities of conditions. The absence or deficiencies of which are and can be the cause and continuation of abuses, injustices, crimes, etc. In general, evil is a reality in the world, while its operation can and should nullify, annihilate, and end the operation of these forces, or at least free them from them within the scope of their domination over people and humanity.
This important factor is the protective and protective law log.-def.*, which benefits people and protects them logically and in accordance with their capabilities and rights. The nature, foundations, and scope of this law were formulated by the author of this article-post in his study: „On Law and Laws in General…”, available on his website: bryzy2.com. The author stated that such content is lacking, essentially nonexistent in public circulation, in the media, in the civic sphere, etc., and believes, states ad logica, that the dissemination of knowledge, data, and education about this—as the author believes—fundamental, universal, and reliable law is ultimately just and justified with respect to critical rational-logical criteria (log.-def.*) for humans in general, as representatives of the human species (or genus), whose general foundations, scopes, and justifications with respect to logical (log.-def.*) criteria of truth were formulated and developed by the author, logically (log.-def.*) with respect to criteria of truthfulness, truth. Therefore, he published his aforementioned work. In this article-post, he wishes to draw attention to the beneficial value of this work for people, in the context of the possibility of disseminating and implementing its content, its beneficial value(s) for humans, and de facto for humanity as a whole.
Among other things, The value of this aforementioned (indicated) work on general and universal law for people is the ability to further define or use it as an algorithmic constant to solve problems, detect fraud, falsification, or crime, or the ability to eliminate it evidentially, forensically, in law, and not only in legal matters, but also in the category of truth correctly formulated on any topic (which, as logically approached various topics, of course already has some reality).
* —
* – In reference to the author’s study-post entitled „On Law and Laws in General…”, available on the author’s website (https://bryzy2.com)
. Designation; * – In this article, the author used the designated term with the intention of correcting the previously used term, in Marxism or simply during the communist era, as a concept or expression: false logic, which (in Marxism) was supposed to be the opposite of true logic, which was then understood as logically consistent with truth, its sentences and rulings being either true or false, but The writer here takes into account that, ultimately, logic cannot be false, i.e., inconsistent with truth, just as established factuality as truth cannot be false with respect to logic. A logical proposition is always about something, has a topic, and the proposition is either based on facts or is derived from beyond the facts. However, in such contexts, the writer prefers to use a definition or distinction regarding the nature of such a logically constructed proposition, that is, distinguishing whether the proposition concerns real facts or is poetry, prose, fraud, or belongs to another category regarding the facts it indicates.
_____
In order to, FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING POSSIBLE (OPPORTUNITIES) actions, to take actions for the purpose of realizing them as possible, not only as possibilities but for implementing positive, beneficial changes regarding important, fundamentally bad, negative phenomena, events, situations in the world that threaten people – at least in some geographical places – or more broadly, people from some places, the author has developed and wants to present some important in some contexts and regarding data and possibilities of logical actions for optimization, evolutionary or even revolutionary regarding the logical meaning of these data, important, critical details, for innovative use of these data, which according to the author of this article-post can change the world, people’s lives for the better, in accordance with the criteria of logical reason regarding compliance with the truth – (according to the author of this article-post) – knowledge about these important contents should be spread, also along with addressing related topics in the context/contexts of these very important contents, whether on civic, educational, educational platforms, also possibly related from the scientific, university side, etc. Of course, one should first Please familiarize yourself with this basic text (titled „On Law and Rights…”, available on the author’s website indicated above).
The author of this article/post wishes to point out that he has compiled the relevant data as details, foundations, and scopes, formulated primarily in his study entitled: „On Law and Rights in General…”, available at On the author’s website (bryzy2.com), which can and should be the optimal, only, and logical criteria for truth-based solutions to significant problems regarding human rights in the context of the possibility of repair(s), correction(s), and change(s) based on logical criteria (log.-def.*) for repair—as the author demonstrates, he presents in logically (logically-definitively*) formulated sentences a rational and thought-process that, in summary, possesses the characteristics of a synthetically comprehensive, fundamental, universally applicable, general law, possessing the characteristic(s) of truthfulness, the characteristic(s) of conformity with the nature of man, of people, and, most generally, being beneficial to people as representatives, as, in essence, perhaps most generally speaking: precedent(s) in existence, as existing fact(s). So the author believes that he has found a simply formulated solution that is logical, honest, and profitable in its essence regarding the possibility of betterment, securing people for their due rights, their legitimate honesty, beneficial for the freedom that is legitimate for people, legality that protects or secures people, without dogmatics, populisms or totalitarian-authoritarian influences, it is important that it is appropriate, optimal for various places and situations – regarding the general multiplicity of phenomena, familiarize yourself with this content and confront it with possible critical comments (in other articles on his pages the author has published some of his materials on various topics, details – ad multiple multiplicity currently, in other articles-posts).
– RELEVANT AD PRE DATA TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT FOR REPAIRS (for changes for the better, for/for benefits to people (generally) regarding the quality of their being/existence/existence, including the sum of their state of existence, in existence.
SOMEWHAT OUTLINED: –
– PRE-DATA, FOR CONSIDERATION. FOR REPAIRS (for changes for the better) beneficial to people (generally) regarding the quality of their being/existence/existence, including the sum of their state of existence, in existence.
Pre-DATA, FOR CONSIDERATION, FOR repairs (for changes for the better): – [strategy, tactics, and logistics], is for action, actions, – action.
[category – Goal – AS – (this is about) – TRANSFORMATION, REPAIR, GAIN, ENRICHMENT, as a broad, basic possibility of BETTER FROM WORSE —regarding the category of a possible state, states of existence (ad the sum of the state of existence) or their possibilities, ad category, criterion honesty towards the law and truth, not blocking, not harming people, their innate and inherent rights, features of legitimate dignity, equality towards/with respect to the law and the right to freedom. The STRATEGY here is: LAUNCHING positive changes through understanding, disseminating data about logical data and their importance for possible development, implementing positive factors in place of negative ones, which can and should bring, create, and realize positive, beneficial changes (logically regarding the state, meaning, value, and understanding that gives the possibility of realizing the use of possible beneficial, profitable de facto changes, for people and by people, – in Being, in the state of Being, regarding possible changes in the factuality of the state/states of existence, in existence, emancipation of people – as optimally as possible to understand the essential foundations – according to the author of this post – for a better life, with all legal foundations (in general), regarding the quality and one’s own life and in collective contexts of being as one single being towards or with respect to others lives, i.e., regarding other people.
The author of this post aims to draw attention to the issue of clearing up legal ambiguities regarding the situation in individual countries, states, and international relations, drawing attention to a significant factor concerning people, their lives, and their values, which determines the foundations and ultimate possibilities of conditions. The absence or deficiencies of which are and can be the cause and continuation of abuses, injustices, crimes, etc. In general, evil that operates is a reality in the world, while its operation can, and should, nullify, annihilate, and end the operation of these forces, or at least free them from them within the scope of their domination over people or humanity.
This important factor is the protective and protective law log.-def.*, which benefits people and protects them logically and in accordance with their capabilities and rights. The nature, foundations, and scope of this article-post were formulated by the author of this article-post in his study: „On Law and Laws in General…”, available on his website: bryzy2.com.
____________–_____
* – With reference to the author’s study-post titled „On Law and Laws in General…”, available on the author’s website (https://bryzy2.com)
.Denotation; * – This article refers to the fact that the author used the designated term with the intention of correcting the previously used term, in Marxism or simply during the Polish People’s Republic, as a concept: false logic. This term (in Marxism) was meant to be the opposite of true logic, which was then understood as logically consistent with truth; its sentences and pronouncements were either true or false. However, the writer takes into account that, ultimately, logic cannot be false, i.e., inconsistent with truth, just as established factuality as truth cannot be false with respect to logic. A logical proposition is always about something; it has a topic, and a proposition is either based on facts or derived from beyond the facts. However, in such contexts, the writer prefers to use a definition or distinction regarding the nature of such a logically constructed proposition, that is, distinguishing whether the proposition concerns real facts, is poetry, prose, fraud, or belongs to another category regarding the facts it indicates.
_____
The author stated that there is a lack of, and in fact, no, such content in public circulation, in the media, among citizens, etc., and believes, states ad logica, that the dissemination of knowledge, data, and education about this—as the author believes—fundamental universal and reliable law is ultimately just and justified with regard to critical rational-logical criteria (log.-def.*) in general, for people as representatives of the human species (or genus), whose general foundations, scopes, and justifications with regard to logical (log.-def.*) criteria of truth were formulated and developed by the author, logically (log.-def.*) with regard to the criteria of truthfulness, truth, according to the author. Therefore, he published his aforementioned work. In this article-post, he wants to draw attention to the beneficial value of this work for people, in the context of the possibility of disseminating and implementing its content, its beneficial value(s) for people and for humanity. In fact, the entirety of it.
Among other things, the value of this aforementioned study on general and universal law for humans lies in the ability to further define or use it as an algorithmic constant to solve problems, detect fraud, falsification, or crime, or to eliminate it evidentially, forensically, and legally—not only legal ones, but also the category of truth correctly formulated on any topic (which, as logically understood, has its own reality).
TACTICS: data, education, general knowledge about value(s), the possibilities of realizing them, and the benefits derived from them. Securing the values and benefits at least possible using the strongest security category, i.e., the category of truth, regarding the category of truth.
1) – Logical-Definitive Laws – These are the basis for the possibility of optimizing law, the general law of rights for humans—as the author of this article presents and logically justifies (logical-definitive*). in his study entitled: „On Law and Laws in General…” (on his website: bryzy2.com) [and the only logical, rationally critical one, as evidenced by the analysis and synthesis in the content of the aforementioned study, regarding the critical criterion(s) of truth, compliance with the truth.]
Here – ad truth – not introducing/not introducing this fundamental, universal law may be related to ignorance, hypocrisy, falsification, criminal attitudes, blocking for dishonest gain, meaning there is no ultimate or substantive basis for compliance with the truth, nor with the law logically-definitively*, i.e., correctly formulated.
The solution to such obstacles is, of course, information, the provision of data, and therefore education, presenting the benefits of this by its very nature and the foundations consistent with logically-definitive reason regarding the critical criteria (logically-definitive*), which are also a safeguard for people, ultimately for humanity. As representatives of the human species.
_ [ *strategy repair, *tactics – education, provided along with the provision of data in general and regarding details/specificity, media-mass communication, * logistics – these are probably technical details that need to be fixed].
– Re: Strategy, Tactics, Logistics: – If one adheres to the basic logic, even as an algorithm, a log.-def. law, or as a starting point, with its log.-def.* references to logically (log.-def.) applied contexts (topics), then, understanding the basis (___about which and which the author indicated and formulated in the above-mentioned study…____), one can consistently apply it to a wide variety of situations, including law, rights, truth, and all its extensions to a wide variety of, de facto, all possible details that can be clearly, logically, and consistently applied, and this is consistent – even only consistent – with the integrity of truth regarding logically (log.-def.*) formulated (including correctly, accurately, adequately…) generalities or details that also have a characteristic/characteristics consistent with the nature of man, people, even the human species (or genus), as beneficial, protective, etc. for people, for humanity, regarding the general state of existence, in a legitimate manner for people – – the term logic, logicality is known, but the term: logical-definitionally*, logical-definitional* or on the topic, regarding topics within the scope of type or category: regarding truth etc. is the method of the author of these studies „On the General Law…”, especially in the title, main one, available on the above-mentioned author’s website: bryzy2.com [Explanation of the asterisk marking:* – This term: logical-def… was used by the author of these contents as, in order to… Designation; * – This article refers to the fact that the author used the designated term with the intention of correcting the previously used term, in Marxism or simply during the Polish People’s Republic, as a concept: false logic. This term (in Marxism) was meant to be the opposite of true logic, which was then understood as logically consistent with truth; its sentences and pronouncements were either true or false. However, the writer takes into account that, ultimately, logic cannot be false, i.e., inconsistent with truth, just as established factuality as truth cannot be false with respect to logic. A logical proposition is always about something; it has a theme, and a proposition is either based on facts or derived from beyond the facts. However, in such contexts, the writer prefers to use a definition or distinction regarding the nature of such a logically constructed proposition, that is, distinguishing whether the proposition concerns real facts, is poetry, prose, fraud, or belongs to another category regarding the facts it indicates.
[**XXXX****- zerw. ciągł textu ..!!!!>>>>1-2 zdania.
2) – the novelty of this, such an approach is related to the comparatively in many places in the world (through information about new data, about the beneficial value of these data, even in the legal and defining systems defined as democratic, independent, free states, even in the constitutionally formulated content, which is often associated with the so-called colloquial-populist approaches that do not define purely logically regarding the formulation of constitutional rights, regarding the entire content, also at least regarding various details, so there are deficiencies or inconsistencies regarding logic, at least not going beyond, or in other words, not reaching the logical-definitional scopes in actions or in correct, correct formulations regarding the criterion of log.-def.* compliance with the truth, the formulation of which from the beginning to the end is the fact of the correctness of the formulation or formulations of law (in its foundations and in contextual developments, regarding the most diverse details, more generally, regarding the entire diversity of contexts or details in the multiple multiplicity of its applications) or in other areas, ad topics or fields.
– TO: TACTICS: If one adheres – even as an algorithm, a log.-def., fundamental law – that is, as a starting basis, with its log.-def.* references to logically (log.-def.) applied contexts (topics),
then, understanding the basis (___about which and which in the above-mentioned study the author indicated, formulated…____), one can consistently apply it to a wide variety of situations ad law, rights, truth, all its extensions to a wide variety of – de facto – possible details that can be clearly, logically, consistently applied, and this is consistent – even only consistent – with the fact of the integrity of truth regarding logically (log.-def.*) formulated (including correctly, accurately, adequately…) generalities or details that also have a feature/features consistent with the nature of man, people, even the human species (or genus), as beneficial, protective, etc. for people, for humanity, regarding the general state of existence, in a legitimate manner for people.
______________——-___________
In general, I hereby notify, announce, postulate, and call for attention to this universal law, about which the author (of this article-post) formulated a basic, comprehensive, synthetic (with possible additions), logical, and definitionally correct whole in the study-post entitled: „On Law and Rights in General…”, available on the author’s website (bryzy2.com).
– As a law that is logical and consistent with truth (in terms of practice, logic, and definition*), having ultimate consistency with honesty, optimality, and free from falsehood or harm, evil as such (according to the author, it is easy—as the author sees—to define truthfully or distinguish evil from good, if it is revealed, perceived, and then implemented, applied as acting (together with its formal and legal legitimization [Here—formulated rationally, logically (log.-def.*) regarding the log.-definition* rational criterion) truthfulness (or falsehood about something)]. – [Through info-data, education, citizen platforms, media and for government representatives, in many, in different countries, wherever possible.]
– Such a situation is the basis and possibility of formulating, understanding, applying, observing, or communicating a clear, understandable, and unambiguous law or laws for people, formulated by people in general, that are possible and should be formulated – according to the author of this post –
– This law also encompasses and transcends differences, often at the minor levels of party, political and populist paralysis, conflicts, including those regarding religion (this is mentioned by the author of this article, because many conflicts and falsifications regarding truth and law, against logical and definitional criteria*, have occurred, exist, and even pose significant threats to, towards, or regarding people (the author writes a bit about this topic in his posts on his aforementioned website).
– Here is the context, that the conformity of the formulation of content with logic regarding truth – and here competence… – gives the value of truth, understanding, confirmation of conformity with truth and with understanding, with critical reason regarding the criterion of confirmation or confirmations of truth or falsehood, as well as true freedom – because this is undoubtedly the path to freedom, and legitimate and tolerant and entitled to people, humanity in general, rights, and possible basic, decent conditions for people.
Here, of course, the author takes into account that people have different personal characteristics and does not claim that every person has the same competences for everything, in the sense that, for example, to become a judge or a lawyer, one must have certain abilities and appropriately competent knowledge, studies, etc.
4) – In order to move from a situation of deficiencies to a situation of consistently formulated fundamental law without deficiencies, which also need to be corrected from above (i.e., the need for a logically formulated constitutional content), starting from a logical basis (justification, value, purpose, goals, ways of achieving goals – ad consistent, competent) of the existence and formulation of law, these deficiencies should be noted and one should begin to correct/amend both the foundations and the obvious or most important errors (e.g., the content about the possibility of changing the system from a democratic one to another can be nothing more than a desperate – at best – attempt to save values in search of something that can save the state or citizens from (This is a case of permissiveness or harmful populism pushed under the guise of someone gaining a mere numerical majority, which could pose a threat in situations where, for example, the lives of citizens are at risk, with the alternative being, for example, captivity, but then, for example, with the hope of regaining freedom.)
– In a state, this topic should probably be properly addressed first, so that citizens understand the importance, significance, and significance of the need for such changes. However, for optimal action to be effective, the fundamentals of optimal action should be considered. Both „top” and „bottom” are important, so there should be logical information, preparation, and people from the bottom (independent general public information) for office-holders and local officials (bottom) and at the top (representatives of the authorities in the highest positions). Details remain, which should determine the optimality of actions and opportunities, both in terms of information and in terms of spheres and platforms for introducing and ultimately implementing the correct changes, as correctly as possible.
5) – What to pay attention to: – Currently, there are many conflicts, including bloody ones, which are downright destructive to people on an international scale, so perhaps it is worth sounding some kind of general alarm.
Such alarms are currently visible daily in the media. Looking at the situation in general, globally, it is probably worth using logical-definition arguments* about the essence of the needs of humanity, for people in general, critically and competently introducing relevant data, issues of logical definitions regarding truth, regarding the factual situation[.] However, the situation is such that descriptions of situations often lack precision regarding the unambiguity of the logical-definition law, because there are many ambiguities related to the category of so-called Politics, the unknowns, variables, and unpredictability of many phenomena or their meaning or nature in relation to other movements or forces, and there is a situation of unresolved conflict, and the usurpation(s) of totalitarian-authoritarian forces with their harmful effects are trying to insinuate themselves, mixing them with claims that are supposedly justified or even based on some legal claims or actions.
THE AUTHOR OF THIS ARTICLE-POST HAS AN IDEA, A PROPOSAL that can change a lot, INTRODUCING positivity, BETTERNESS, in place of worseness, i.e., negative, evil (education, dialogue, or court): „BECAUSE BETTERNESS IS BETTER THAN WORSENESS, AND WORSENESS IS WORSE THAN BETTERNESS” (author’s add.) (Tactically, it’s probably worth considering: modesty and addressing or confronting, analyzing problems, learning. – Accurate, logical data regarding truth, including possibilities, are important. People do this, but what matters is putting things in order, repairing the worst negatives, pain points, and problems in accordance with the basic „algorithm” of compliance with the law, with truth in criteria, and therefore also logical formulations (including definitions). – Developing such data as logically formulated regarding the logical criterion of truth gives people the tools to implement them, to achieve states of trust, that is, to implement them.
– It can and should be analyzed (citizen-wise, inter-citizen-wise), – platforms, up to and from the official or government sides, possibly, competently, logically (e.g., the logic of data selection, systematics, etc.).
– We should certainly strive to expose, abolish, and „deactivate” corruption, totalitarianism, or phenomena in general. rapes, abuses, injustices, etc., in order to move from the negative, error, from worse to better.
– inspections, too, somehow (also verifiable regarding their results, e.g., by some competent official-citizen platforms, reports, etc.) — in accordance with the law, log.-def.* laws. Matters, issues of problems, conflicts, sources of conflicts, evil regarding, in reference to, in reference to the ABOVE-MENTIONED study: „On Law and Laws in General…”, as if as a logarithm of laws, from general, fundamental law, making the undertaken contexts of such logical (log.-def.) approach, presenting and presenting problems and possibilities of logical-definition* solving matters, topics, certainly
one should distinguish, address matters, topics in log.-def.* contexts – and law, international and domestic laws, domestic ones, in possible cases of ad and singularity, and Collectives of people (we all belong to the human species, capable of reasoning logically-def.* regarding truth (what matters here is sharing data and persuasion, arguments about the law and rights beneficial to people, to the human species and interdependence, also that this will also be some kind of legacy for future generations – a legacy for children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, etc.). Preserving and securing the basic rights of dignity, freedom, and logical (log.-def.*) compliance with equality before or regarding the law are certainly the foundations of rights beneficial to people, but crimes, wrongdoings, etc. should be punished, corrected, and nullified logically and competently regarding the possibility of blocking, ending evil, correcting, and transforming worse into de facto better.
BASICALLY, it appears that—especially military powers, but also smaller systems and phenomena, totalitarian actions have become so emboldened and manifested after the optimism of transformation following the fall of totalitarianism in the East at the end of the 20th century. (In this context, if not narrow groups, then even individuals in power are causing and spreading disruptions, abuses of usurpation, corruption, criminal wrongdoing, and more or less openly).
Given the facts of such abuses regarding the criteria of log.-def. law, including the log.-def. Criteria for truth, CERTAINLY NEED TO BE TAKEN – civic and possibly governmental movements (taking into account contexts of ignorance, changes in situation, or other…), even by citing arguments of precedents, events, or positive, beneficial phenomena that have already occurred, existed, and were better than worse. But it is important to present possible betterness over worse, existing, or existing worseness, in relation to logical-definitional law*, logically and definitively consistent with truth.
THE DEFINITION of the term, the concept of DEMOCRACY as demos-kratos (power-people) is related to compliance with fundamental law (in the author’s case, with logical-definitional law*), with fundamental rights, which are confirmed by the logical-definitional criterion of truth regarding critical (logical) reason (as the author demonstrates in his aforementioned article-post „About Law…” on bryzy2.com). It logically follows ad critical reason that since a human being or humans are capable of choices, selectivity logically consistent with the lod.-def.* criterion/criteria regarding truth, with recognizing truth, including distinguishing truth from falsehood, which is the only and best tool, feature, potential of a human being, human nature, people, which is related to phenomenality and to the possibilities of coordination, organization, change, creation of benefits in actions, reactions, in being in terms of its quality, the existing state into an appropriate, different or better state, then the law of log.-def. as, the only ultimately beneficial, that is, and actually beneficial generally and especially for people – only because it has the features of being formulated truthfully, critically, unambiguously and communicatively, transferably, informatively, and therefore also understanding, coordinating or co-coordinating regarding various topics, scopes for people and actually by a multitude of people, so having the nature and rights/laws for or regarding an individual, singularity and towards or regarding a multitude of people, human, to this very thing in accordance, as de facto consistent with the coordinating and selective whole of each person, people regarding the category of all humanity (even though not every person of this function is fundamentally specialized or focused on the use or direction of knowledge about logic or the capabilities of the human mind, paying attention to nuances in these scopes or fields, etc.), it has the feature, features of both general and specific, including somehow essentially ultimate benefit for man, for people.
– !!! -And to a large extent this is already happening, but the author of this article-post wants to draw attention to ____ tactics, ___ NEED! – : adhering consistently to the consistent core of universal law (log.-def.*) for people in general, (for humanity in general, which is a logical approach to facts, to truth, to the understanding of phenomena, facts, and whose logical definition, formulated in the scope of fundamental and general law regarding truth, about which the BASICS, JUSTIFICATIONS of its right to introduce and apply it, as BENEFITS for people, including for all of humanity, as a potential ultimately beneficial for all, because it has the characteristics of securing/protecting people, humanity from harm or lawlessness regarding logic, regarding the logical (log.-def.*) compliance with the logical (log,-def.) recognition and securing the operation of this log.-def.* law. observing it…, which as a result gives people actually in accordance with the constitution of truth regarding people and their rights, opens up opportunities for people (or more broadly, potentially for all of humanity) for development in a logically and legally favorable situation, the basic conditions for the fundamental logical law (log.-def.*), for the better, for the overall benefit.
——–______-__—–
[In Trump’s case, perhaps officials are able to check, verify the details, e.g., the compliance of regulations, the implementation of laws with American law regarding the law of the logical-definition* and the Constitution of the United States. At the same time, courts can probably also stop, block decisions that do not comply with the law, the law of the logical-definition*, or the nature, essence of someone’s actions, which are wrong, contrary to the law, including the basic constitutional law, at least in accordance with the truth and law regarding the criterion(s), critical, rational, and logical criteria. – !!!__ (the writer points out important contexts of the content of the terms: logical-definition* or logical-definition* for the reason that for many people, probably not only from countries previously associated with Marxism or Leninism, truth and logical meaning appear as false, relative, or as uncertain data, or: „possibly false,” even if the arguments should then be consistent with the law.] The power and legality of truth consistent with the lophic-definitional law*, that is, consistent with truth correctly formulated in the logical-definitional sense*, to have the power to prevail in the US Congress.] _!!!
Add examples:
For example, Trump’s recent moves, at least, against various important, logically advantageous situations for democracy, for example, somehow smack of at least betrayal regarding the existing NATO alliance of free democratic states (he has begun to manifest his inclinations towards Canada and Greenland, and these are precedents of violating, betraying the alliance, antidemocratically, totalitarian, ignoring the category of logical raison d’état regarding democratic principles and the statuses of the alliance’s co-participants as co-participants, their rights as members of this alliance, which is supposed to protect, co-protect democratic co-allies, and not threaten them!).
, de facto violating the status of their inviolability, not only legitimate from the perspective of general democratic law, but also a betrayal of the US’s declared commitment to safeguarding the security of its allies, participating independent states (NATO), and voluntary participants under a binding agreement.
In a logical and definitional sense, it is probably clear that Trump, as president, did not announce a plan to dismantle NATO or attack the sovereign, at least independent, or allied rights of any of the participating allies. The US, if the author understands correctly, did not undermine the NATO alliance, but was a co-participant, and Trump did not announce in the elections that he wanted to dismantle the alliance or the law, logical in its definition.
Trump also promised a quick peace for Ukraine, but he did not announce that he would treat Putin, a criminal under international law, as a respectable representative, a legal president of a population in accordance with international law, because the principles of democracy and the legitimacy of power or representation of someone as a leader of a state exclude anyone who acts against fundamental rights or prefers a criminal, a terrorist, an international criminal with the status of a de facto villain, such as Putin has become. The second context is the matter of ignoring the essence of such phenomena and the status of state leaders regarding politics in general, the issue of some important balance regarding the entire state in connection with trying to obtain material and convenient benefits for this purpose, but ignoring the basic protection of people against strengthening, allowing the increase or increase of both the power and influence of somehow powerful totalitarian-imperial or totalitarian-authoritarian forces in the world (mainly Putin and the Chinese Xiao, but also other states, also dangerous to the law or logical, logical-definitional laws regarding Logical definitional criteria* of truthfulness.
Trump uses the arguments of his power (in essence, the power of the state he presides over) and the category of benefits for his country (state) to a range/ranges exceeding the democratic, allied principles of mutual security, not threatening allies. He also argues, in a truly usurpatory manner, about the difference between mere power and logical definition of what he proposes or does, about the magnitude of the log.def.* value of democracy as such, already existing in the world, and the defensive alliance of NATO democratic forces. However, there is also a significant positive continuity, unusual in the world, which has existed for quite a long time. This is not only the civilization known as Western, but also a culture that differs not only in size but also in its undeniable difference from the rest of the world, and yet in some continuity of connections—on a global scale, where the United States, however, has continuity related to its origins even in Europe, even though it has liberated itself from the rule/authority of Europe, giving it an example of the possibility of living under the banner of the „Statue of Liberty.” and the famous: „liberty for all” (also connections and culture and art – after all, it is the descendants from Europe who dominate and rule there!).
Regarding Trump, it’s probably worth examining the details of his actions or statements from a legal perspective (log.-def.*), specifically his speeches and various statements (perhaps in certain situations? – status issues certainly matter, but so does the content). It’s crucial – in the opinion of the author of this post – that the president of a status-democratic country or state should not be an anti-democrat or patronize totalitarian-authoritarian systems or actions, because this log.-def.* operates against the legal categories of even the state he’s supposed to represent. It is also important from the definitional point of view that republicans, republicanism (this is ad USA) has no basis for treating or underestimating the essentially human values of democracy as tolerating or preferring, manifesting, and especially focusing on totalitarian or totalitarian-authoritarian actions, behind which the so-called Populism (ad populizm) certainly matters the logical and definitional result regarding the actual content of the content, it is not the language or style of the law lod.-def.*.
– and having, however (inherited as president) and being in the category of democratic rights, independence of at least allies, the democratic NATO alliance as a defensive alliance of a group of democratic states, security, or securing democratic allies against the aggression of totalitarian-authoritarian, essentially anti-democratic systems (Europe, at his demands, has begun to arm itself more), Trump turns away from Europe so much that it seems to the writer like pettiness and betrayal. Trump is not a man who shows respect for the best values in certainly important contexts, and his isolationism from Europe and respect for democratic states and rights in contexts of his, however, lower status of rights and situations important as values both for Americans and for the entire democratic world.
– (after all, America won’t be an isolated little house without the rest of the world anyway; Europe could become a distant little house, among various houses, such as the Chinese, Russian, and others), in favor of greedy materialism and a desire for more personal power rather than loyalty to essential values, protecting the rights and achievements of the West from the negative influences of Eastern authoritarian totalitarianisms with their long and deep shadow the closer they are, and coming to terms with totalitarian-authoritarian leaders threatens democracy as an achieved stage of humanity in general, and threatens, goes towards building forces opposed to development, the evolution of humanity towards non-development, or maintaining the sum of what has already been achieved, for example, in the 20th century (although even in Europe, despite the general positives of the European Union, there are lacks of intelligent, definitional freedom and a kind of stagnation, probably populist in some way), – in favor of building a system of some kind of equality as a system of democratic forces and somehow allowed (probably out of greed) totalitarianisms in the world as some kind of equality, but this is leaning towards building, allowing independent democracies (to independent democracies), somehow tilting (even underpinning) the power of negative influences on democracy, its values, and its space, in favor of the influence of forces hostile to democratic freedoms, giving them (in quotation marks) a kind of confirmation as if they had legal status, as legitimate as states of law or full rights from the perspective of the context(s) of logical law, logically-def.* laws, as if they were legally human rights (e.g., regarding human and civil rights) regarding truth, or as/supposedly comparable to one equivalence in the contexts of permitted pluralism in co-participation in existence, in „being,” etc.
It seems that Trump, under his populist or egocentrically unclear actions, his lack of clarity for others, despite individual manifestations of his brilliance, does not strengthen or protect the values of the democratic world, but weakens them and collaborates with manifestations and forces totalitarian-authoritarian, its manifestations of caring about material profits for Americans collide with changes in the quality and situation of the so-called free world of free people, also with the state of facts, statuses and values of the free world in proportion to the totalitarian-authoritarian world, also with regard to the influence of populism, which is also manifested to some extent in other democracies, e.g. in Europe.
The author wrote the most about Trump in this post, because he is currently the most powerful decision-maker in the world of democracy, in which the author also lives. His country, the state, is probably the strongest military power currently in NATO and in the world of democratic, so-called Western civilizations, but it seems that he is the one who does not meet the needs of the free, democratic world in important respects, –
– although Europe, so-called A free, democratic EU also falls short on some important points, primarily the inundation of such high-ranking (managing) bodies with populist regulations or expectations that are simply non-definitive from a legal perspective, e.g.,
The author of this post finds the attempt to improve the situation in the free media (internet) regarding emerging content by making attempts to improve content through censorship, which is essentially non-definitive from a legal perspective, very blatant. A solution worthy of democracy is certainly freedom of speech, liberal courts that are intelligent in the nature of potential suspicions of illegality, and prevention only and only within specific limits or in clear cases, without inhibiting freedom of speech and without distorting authentic content, because that would be a real „Sodom and Gomorrah”(!). Freedom of speech, freedom of expression and prevention should only count in the event of real abuses (even taking into account the important contexts from the log.-def.* side, important from the substantive side (taking into account various contexts relevant for the diagnosis). If the current Polish president had not prevented this essentially populist-totalitarian censorship, there would be no freedom of speech, only the censorship of bigots, in fact stemming from the sources of populism or authoritarian-totalitarian patterns and the falsification of such a regulation, perhaps often not different from the censorship of various partitioning powers, whose task was to channel the functioning of natural possible flows, about which Poles know something from the history of their own country. THE POWER OF HONEST FREEDOM IS TRUTH, AND EVERYTHING HAS ITS STATUS WITH REGARD TO TRUTH – (there is also a good one: „LIBERTY FOR ALL!”), so somehow the power of legitimate freedom cannot, should not be limited, That is, it is thwarted by a top-down censorship of behavior and expression, which, for the sake of convenience, expects only polite or seemingly polite behavior, even though in reality, culture and refinement can be or are positive, „up-to-date,” and beneficial. However, one cannot force someone who is outraged or angry about something to submit to censorship. Besides, if necessary, these are the laws of logic and definition. But one cannot train or force people to conform to a formula, because there may be more hypocrisy under the guise of precision, even though hypocrisy and falsehood may also be hidden behind so-called „incensorship.”
– the lack of logic leads to a flood of trash, fraud, and allows (due to under-definition or lack of honesty in the language, hypocritical or so-called populist „languages”, meaning that, for example, it is supposedly generally accepted, everyone does it, etc., but the content is not substantive or correctly formulated and formulated). True democracy does not block development, but helps, enables, and even supports its possibilities (as long as it is in the process of criticality, prevention, intended to protect the population or society from corruption, fraud, etc.), and of course, the basis, meaning some positive/positive potential in people.
Log.-def.* law is able to maintain rights for people (consistent with their honest, permitted freedom), and pluralistic contexts are also important, that people can have role models, references, etc., and that no one can be persecuted for being different, unless something is criminal, sick, or perverted. In this case, even protective rights against persecution are important, but only in relation to/in relation to other people should prevention be used for crimes, not imagined, someone’s imagination, which in fact constitutes some kind of projection unjustified by the reality of the threat.
Log.-def.* law has foundations, principles, and a general competence for the benefit of people that does not block development, positive aspects, or fundamental freedoms. people (logical-definition*) and aims to protect people’s rights and their protections, permitted and possible, if they are not contrary to this law, i.e., actually wrong, criminal towards other people (which is determined, for example, by…). A thorough examination, including a court that takes into account the relevant examination and issues a verdict or sentence, as well as appeal possibilities should, can be (inspections, even citizen checks), should always decide logically-definition*, including possible appeals as a possibility (data counts), a logically-definitional criterion regarding truthfulness.
Such a law, taking into account logically-definition* truthfulness and a fair judgment based on general prevention, punishment, or innocence, should also, of course, be logically-definitional and truthful, taking into account the degree of punishment regarding at least a fair relationship, a balance between the loss of the victim (the object, subject of the crime) and the degree of punishment for the criminal, – then such a law is a feature, has a protective, securing, and just feature for people, their rights, also regarding their environments, the logical-definitional formulations of justifications regarding the criterion of truth certainly matter.
Another very important point is that the characteristics (or unique individuality of each person, citizen) cannot, in a true democracy—regarding their fundamental rights—deprive them or their individual characteristics of their authenticity in favor of authoritarian-totalitarian coercion or manipulation. This is also true in the category of so-called populism, regarding the basic law of log,-def.*, be forced into something below the „Universal Law” specified by the author of this article, the general, lod-def.* Law for people, for representatives of the human species, which the author formulated in his study-post entitled „On Law and Rights in General…” a logical-synthetic whole, and which is available on the author’s website mentioned above.
_______________________________________—-__________
Time is running fast, and the author of this text, seeing Trump’s various untrustworthy actions (conducts) leading to the weakening of solidarity, alliances, and international law protecting freedom, the right to democratic rights, or generally ad rights log.-def.* due, beneficial to people as representatives of the human species, sees the need for some kind of competent critical analysis, critical analyses of his actions regarding the criterion(s) of compliance with the logical-definitional law, universal, general for people, also regarding the entire world, especially taking into account the law log.-def.* regarding changes in the general state of the democratic world and in the relationship(s) regarding deception strengthening or underpinning powerful totalitarian-authoritarian forces, especially their state representatives, such as Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, or other religious, also authoritarian-totalitarian in nature. Good, relevant data should reach citizens, but also various possible factors or platforms, such as the United States Congress, government offices, and the Judiciary. This should also apply to other countries in various, relevant areas.
So that beneficial transformations, evolutionary or revolutionary changes, can occur, but in accordance with the benefit of people in general, humanity, in accordance with universal law, formulated logically-definitively*, truthful regarding details (of course, including contexts, which are also either details or references), with a protective rationale for comparing possible betterness with threatening worseness in a logically-definitive way*. Perhaps we should also take matters into our own hands or tools, taking into account that, for example, in the case of Trump’s actions, he may in some situations rely on waiting and making moves only after certain precedents or by creating certain precedents, which of course applies to other „rulers” as representatives of states, etc. Therefore, it is important to examine and choose what is optimal, what protects general, universal rights for people, for humanity.
After remarks about Trump, regarding the current situation, the author naturally notes the broad scope of the topic of state systems, states based on the principles of authoritarian totalitarianism, and regarding terrorism as important.
– Totalitarian state systems force people to conform to so-called „rules” defined by the so-called the authorities, in their actions or behavior, have various manifestations of impositions, coercions or regulations so as to direct and regulate people, citizens, population or society, regarding many details centrally in a way or on the principle not so much of taking into account the rights of people themselves, but of maintaining their power, starting from the central one and controlling people within the goals and scopes established on the basis of authoritarian-totalitarian and actions and maintaining and securing this power and system through the imposed regime systemically, in a way, on the basis of totalitarian and authoritarian impositions and coercions.
This differs significantly from democratic systems in that people do not have access to choice, elections based on their own free will, from among those eligible to run, supported by a significant number of people who demonstrate certain qualities, abilities, or support for meeting voter expectations (e.g., in a given region), presenting their skills, goals, etc., as is the case in free democracies. In authoritarian-totalitarian systems, it is the authoritarian-totalitarian authorities who present, nominate, or admit candidates; thus, there are no genuinely free democratic elections.
In both models, various confusions, distortions, or corruptions can occur, but the law of logic and definition* should easily select and identify deviations from the law, corruption, or fraud, while carefully considering relevant data, i.e., information and observations of the actual actions of the selected candidates. It is certainly important whether the selected candidate meets expectations (e.g., regarding the next elections) or whether he or she acts in accordance with constitutional rights or logical-definitional rights in general, or with regard to essential, important details that are intended to protect the state itself constitutionally and legally. The author mentioned the nature of the shortcomings regarding democratic rights as initially formulated log.-def.*, and also, more generally, the shortcomings and even denials of the rights log.-def.* due to people in totalitarian-authoritarian systems. Therefore, he refers to several probably important contexts regarding current conflictual or false situations, larger-scale precedents regarding negativity, falsehood regarding important details regarding or concerning truth, and regarding log.-def.* law. The author thinks that if Putin or another „ruler” (person in power), e.g., Trump, Xiao, or some Islamic religious person (and the categories of any religion do not constitute logical or logically defined laws, log.-def.* rights, do not have such a status or basis for such status regarding the critical criteria of logical consistency with truth), does not take into account the law/laws log.-def.* regarding truth (universal in its foundations and scope) – regarding his abuse (in this scope, in this category), one should examine what sustains him, who supports him, (and Perhaps he’s just a puppet, lacking knowledge or power, or perhaps a „losing player,” etc., perhaps a leader of the riffraff, or of followers who have been falsely manipulated, or under the influence of a corrupt environment.
In such a situation, what counts are log-definition data*, information, and data [certainly technically necessary for correcting the situation, interrupting and ending the abuse, and improving it in a direction consistent with the law of log-definition that benefits people.*
_ [ /*strategy – repair,/ *tactics – education, provided along with sharing data in general and in terms of specifics, mass media, civic platforms, etc./ *logistics – these are probably technical details that need to be fixed].
After the comment about Trump, the author of this post considered the thread about Putin, for example, important. –
– If Putin, in the circumstances immediately after his visit to the church, tells children about his de facto bandit, terrorist attack on Ukraine as something like – i.e., as – a Russian „holy war” for Russia or for Russia, then he is undoubtedly using the force of pressure that is anti-democratic, anti-democratic in nature, irrational in nature, totalitarian in nature, in fact totalitarian-authoritarian (e.g. regarding the category of logical, log.-def.* matters can be resolved through log.-def.* arguments regarding truth and law or rights, and Putin himself has already abused the precedent of attacking Ukraine treacherously or without warning, despite the promise not to attack it in exchange for giving Russia its nuclear weapons (in the presence of representatives of several powers), which Ukraine did in exchange for the promise, but in fact the very fact of Putin’s (Russia’s) armed attack on Ukraine is, was a bandit aggression, an armed attack unjustified under international law or log.-def.*, because Ukraine was in a state of peace and non-aggression as a free democratic state with its right to self-determination, recognized internationally, including by the UN. (Putin also had no right to interfere in Ukraine’s internal affairs; this society had only just formally obtained the status of a full-fledged democracy, and was de facto only just beginning to take shape, possessing legal and state safeguards as a democratic state system.)
According to the law of logic, log.-def.*, Putin is a criminal, a criminal and a wrongdoer for the very fact of his attack on the already established rights of people to self-determination and freedom in a democracy free from totalitarian-authoritarianism. His arguments about Ukraine’s fascism are ad-substantive, merely falsehoods interfering with the actual status of Ukraine’s democratic state.
According to the law of logic, log.-def.*, Putin is a criminal, a criminal and a wrongdoer for the very fact of his attack on the rights of people to self-determination and freedom freedom in an established democracy, already effectively existing as a state that did not want to be part of an aggressive usurper, and which originated from, and is connected to, a circle of people who had influence and inclinations towards totalitarian-authoritarian and de facto imperialist or imperialist totalitarian, authoritarian, and also centralist actions on Moscow’s power and decisive influence over other members of the so-called Russian Federation.
_____
*****
Putin has no logically-def.* argument that Ukraine lacks the right to its own separate identity; it emerged as a separate state, also looking at its history –
– About Ukraine’s separation and difference from Russia, also from the perspective of its historical roots and sources – and the author of this post writes about this because Putin falsifies basic, logical facts from this perspective, such as Putin’s reference to Russia’s historical continuity with Kyiv. But –
– According to historical data, the author has such information that Kyiv existed before Moscow was built, and Ukrainians are people from different regions than Russians; these two tribes were not even directly neighbors. The Russians built Moscow on their own lands (someone from further north helped them, wanting easier trade access to „abundant Kyivan Rus”), far from the Kyiv lands, and their tribe was not even directly neighboring the Ruthenians with their capital in Kyiv. After Moscow was built, to distinguish themselves from the so-called Ruthenians (tribe), they called themselves Russians, because other peoples, sometimes collectively, people from at least several different tribes, and vast areas from the north to the south, were called Ruthenians.
– The history, the separateness, and the difference between Ukraine and Russia are not determined by Putin’s falsification of basic, logical facts, such as Putin’s reference to Russia’s historical continuity with Kiev, even its culture, and even details such as the fact that Russians seem to have adopted or honored some votive offerings from/after the famous Kievan ruler, but that’s not the same as identity. Trump, regarding his actions of treating the international criminal Putin as a representative of a worthy democratic government (as he was formally elected, as president of a democratic country, as far as the author of this article-post knows), or as representing a democratic state, and even enabling him to represent the so-called „Peace Council” he founded—a dubious, impure, in terms of democracy and law, logically-definitively*—especially since he himself does not have a clean slate from the perspective of democracy or democratic law, logically-definitively* (not that he is a Republican, because for democracies, democratic as officially the United States, by definition, this cannot and should not be correctly formulated, i.e., logically-definitively* correctly, the statement that a democrat and a republican is a contradiction. By definition, a democrat is more concerned with the democratic nature of the state, and a republican with the state as a whole and its contents (not without people) as a republic, meaning also a state created by people and for people. This so-called „Peace Council”, looking at its structure, can only be an authoritarian, authoritarian-populist, or even totalitarian-authoritarian conglomeration, and the validity of international law should somehow, for example in the UN, have some enabling law, universal rights for people, basic branches, cells or platforms for talks enabling positive progress or sharing, information releases, even as content: about possible positive changes, transformations, about the possibilities of positives in the face of negative facts and facts about changes in the state, situation of humanity, people, etc. over time, history, etc.
For now, what’s important are activities like civic platforms, information platforms, education platforms, potential inspectorates, etc., and platforms for the UN can, in their own way or in their own way, suggest, use, share relevant data, etc. regarding potential international agreements, established rules, or new—perhaps significant—data that the author has already formulated in his posts.
Regarding China, from a legal perspective, log.-def.* it is a totalitarian-authoritarian state, described as „communist,” but this „communism” is in fact a system of violence, totalitarian-authoritarian, in which people do not decide based on their legitimate human rights to live in freedom, the dignity of birth, and being a single, separate person (this may not always be directly visible in the context of phenomenal events). –
– But the people are subordinated to a central authoritarian-totalitarian power, which is not actually elected on the basis of free elections or on the basis of log.-def.* law, but through the regulations of the totalitarian-authoritarian (dogmatic) power and its apparatus of controlling the population (regardless of whether it is more or less wise). According to the data regarding the formulations of log.-def.*, regarding the log-def.* criteria of truth about the general law, universal for people, for representatives of the human species, the system of communist China does not respect or recognize the right of human freedom with its characteristic of dignity from birth as a human, representing the species (or the human race) with its equality before/with respect to the universal law, the basic general log.-def.*, but limits or cuts it off with a system of totalitarian-authoritarian power, pressure, repression, centrally, from above or using their own enforcement tools in the field, deciding what people can and cannot do, limiting or completely nullifying their rights illegally regarding the log.-def.* law, which is universally and generally consistent with the rights due to people, representatives of the human species. That part of former China, which is the island of Taiwan, is democratic, free from totalitarian-authoritarian, usurping power regarding the law of general logical-definitional law*, i.e. from the majority of China (so-called mainland), as a democracy that is consistent – already in these fundamentals – with the universal logical-definitional law*, with the logical-definitional law* beneficial to people (for representatives of the species or human kind), and as the first condition for the operation of this universal fundamental law, is exposed (in relation to the claims of the communist-totalitarian, authoritarian part of China to Taiwan) to the threat of aggression from that larger part, but usurping, totalitarian-authoritarian, regarding the logical-definitional, universal, general, legitimate law as justified, protective, and beneficial to people, for representatives of the human species, in terms of logical-definitional *conformity with truth. _______
Part two, later additions: –
– (Ukrainians flee Kiev from Russian aggression)
Trump does not unequivocally support NATO or democracy broadly understood, even as a logical or logically (log.-def.*) legitimate domain for people, for representatives or manifestations of the human species. He does not unequivocally defend Ukraine as an enclave or simply as an internationally recognized democratic state separate from Russia that does not intend to be a puppet or subject to totalitarian-authoritarian Russia – and he has the right to do so. And what matters is that Trump is a traitor—this is how he is beginning to manifest himself—disregarding the substance of his allies and the NATO alliance, or the West of the democratic civilized world, but rather the powerful forces, regardless of their legal status. That is, he replaces the arguments of rights and obligations—by category—with categories of material gains (even territorial ones), and the fundamental categories related to constitutionality, human values, integrity in solidarity, or in international, interstate alliances. This isn’t about blocking, but about further possibilities, yet the meaning is somehow consistent and by value (humanism,…).
The author believes that Trump is not the United States or America, but a man who won the US presidential election and, as president, should fulfill his obligations to Americans as US citizens, given the fact that he received a vote of confidence in fulfilling his obligations to take office as president of this democratic country, including regarding the law, the rights of the US, especially as a democratic state elected by a majority vote. And because to run in such elections, one needs—de facto, if the author has sufficient The data on this—a lot of money—may also indicate potential shortcomings regarding the optimality of the choice or the possibility of optimally selecting the best possible candidate (man does not live by bread alone).
– Trump, looking at solidarity with states and the world of democracy, and the continuity of politics, even from the perspective of the development of the humanities after and after World War II, as well as various other related sciences, fields that participated in politics, for example, in Western Europe and the United States, which have political and historical connections and differences, but these civilizational and cultural connections are a very strong analogy or affinity, and it is unlikely that these connections are naturally weakening or losing their significance.
_____
– Putin is already a backward monster, born and bred from, at least mostly, failed colonial, totalitarian-authoritarian, imperialist-totalitarian, etc. policies. He relies on pure force and fraudulent authoritarian-totalitarianism, and does not count It is not related to universal law or logical-definitional law*, to the principles of democracy or logical-definitional law*, which also includes defining democratic values, democracy, humanism, and the scope of its validity. – It seems that Putin is riding on the wagons of his ancient ancestors and activists of a totalitarian-authoritarian, as well as imperialist-totalitarian, nature.
_____
– Xiao – the lack of a logically-definitionally justified law* for the people or the people, its citizens. This absence is a signal, a sign that in communist China there is no law properly formulated, or more briefly: logically or logically-definitionally formulated* regarding the rationally critical criteria of law.
_____
_ Regarding Trump, it is probably important that the critical „Western world,” including the people of the United States, not be deceived by Trump’s pretense and ambiguity, because he talks about his successes but succumbs to totalitarian-imperialist forces. Authoritarian-totalitarian, and sometimes manifests it himself, this exposes humanity to a backward course regarding the state of human existence and the already somewhat free world of democracy and history, which, for example, in hopes, but also based on or concurrent with the development of humanism, etc., at the turn of the 20th and 21st centuries, has repeatedly, on various levels, offered images, visions of the possibility of humanity’s transition to a better era or level of evolution.
So, regarding Trump, but also for him personally, it is certainly worth considering the content expressed here, so that the forces of evil, destruction through populism or other forms do not fully or at all reach truth regarding the content mentioned here regarding the logical, log.-defin.* criteria of truth or against law/rights.
___________
REFERENCE:* –
* -In reference to the author’s study-post entitled „On Law and Laws in General…”, available on the author’s website (https://bryzy2.com)
.Denotation; * – In this article, the author uses the designated term with the intention of correcting the previously used term, in Marxism or simply during the times of the Polish People’s Republic, as a concept or expression: false logic, which (in Marxism) was supposed to be the opposite of true logic, which was then understood as logically consistent with the truth; its sentences and judgments were either true or false, but the writer takes into account here that, ultimately, logic cannot be false, i.e., inconsistent with the truth, just as factuality established as truth cannot be false with respect to logic. A logical statement is always about something, has a topic, and a proposition is either based on facts or is derived from beyond the facts, but in such contexts, the writer prefers to use a definition or distinction regarding the nature of such a logically constructed sentence, that is, distinguishing whether the sentence concerns real facts, is poetry, prose, fraud, or belongs to another category regarding the facts it indicates.
ARTICLE-POST AUTHOR: Mariusz Milewski
Website: https://bryzy2.com
( January 24, 2026)
***
After these comparisons and observations regarding the state of the world, people, and humanity, the AUTHOR OF THIS POST APPEALS: – to any potential readers who see the positive value of the content posted here, to financially support the author and his website, as he lacks the resources to maintain and potentially develop the website. Currently, voluntary, optional donations are only possible via PayPal (a free plugin); for this purpose, active donation icons are placed on the website pages. (Please enter the payment amount in the space marked: „Amount to pay” , in PLN..
***