The girl who ended up in Dubai and was thrown into an Arab prison wasn’t released by the Sheikh of Dubai, nor did England (Great Britain) rescue her from prison. The Prime Minister was some Mohammad, officially an English citizen, who somehow didn’t „break through.” Maybe now the new one, probably of English nationality, might somehow „break through” to get the girl back, who somehow constitutes „a national value of the English,” and also somehow a value of Europe or the so-called West. (The author of this article/post has already written something about the imprisonment or kidnapping of the young English girl on his website: „To the Emir of Dubai”).
Trump, Europe, the Russians and others, and the UN seem to lack the consensus or the de facto strength to defend her human rights, and the Arabs haven’t had the presence (or the strength?) to release her from their territory!
– in Denmark, a newly born baby was taken (rather kidnapped) from a Greenlandic woman, and Trump has already started hunting for Greenland, he himself is expelling emigrants, and from Germany or the EU they tried to force the legalization of homosexual unions for Poland/in Poland (the argument is probably that it is modern, and in detail that it is easier for such a „couple” to travel!) – the author also wrote an article about this – a post on his website (https://bryzy2.com).
– Europe once allowed, and still does, the Jewish religion to be placed on a pedestal, even though its content is totalitarian-authoritarian in nature (e.g., dogmas, etc.), even though it is officially democratic, meaning it should not have any legitimate influence from authoritarianism or totalitarianism (which the author has included important details about in several of his articles – posts on his aforementioned website).
__________-_____
II – —
WHERE WAS I BORN, WHERE HAVE I LIVED, WHERE DO I LIVE? – There was so-called communism, until the „Round Table” talks, then the transition/democratic transformation began, the „Soviet Alliance” collapsed, ended, and my country liberated itself, step by step, from the officially binding, state-controlled communist-type regime that was imposed on Poland after World War II. Poland found itself in Stalin’s sphere of influence and officially the so-called the leading force, i.e. the Polish United Workers’ Party (PZPR), came to power, based on the so-called Leninist-Marxist dogmas. After the „Round Table” talks between the official communist authorities and the opposition, with representatives of „Solidarity” and others. There was a shift away from the previously prevailing dominance, a mandatory dogma in Poland, of communist totalitarianism. However, as far as this writer knows, at the beginning of the transition, the first term still had a 60 percent share of the three previous main forces from the PRL era (the Polish United Workers’ Party, the People’s Party, and the Democratic Party).
[[[„//These transformations led to many significant changes, but temporarily, from today’s perspective, much of the system’s transformation in the context of democratization became silted up and fragmented, such as systemic structures, staffing, and representations of various orientations, etc. Arguments about democracy and freedom also appeared, in the form of arguments about democracy and freedom, and various influences from „different milieus,” „different orientations,” and perhaps there were burdens such as cd. after the „Round Table” agreements, where „personal and political influences and orientations somehow came into being and were mixed into various „balances of power” in de facto narrowed systems, if compared with the category of a FREE, DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY, as it is today, various so-called „political orientations” were revealed or formed, many of which were related to that „muddy past”. According to the writer, there was a lack of a truly new, innovative definition and integration of the whole of society into a sufficiently good status uniting the whole of society, and in place of this lack, oppositions began to multiply that were not suitable for the integration of all citizens, if not extremes, then oppositions, or conservatism or right-wingism, de facto pitting some against the other or not corresponding in important issues, differences began to be valued and sometimes supposedly modesty, exposing differences, but the whole of society began to be fragmented and de facto the forces of differences began to dominate, in the absence of basic definitions and consensus of the whole of society as one whole of one nation or one population of Poland, one state internally consistent with itself in important matters, contexts, which was revealed or manifested more in disputes regarding the media, but what was missing most was probably the process, emancipatory and educational activities, after the Polish People’s Republic there were no comprehensive visions that would be logical, a comprehensive vision FOR THE PEOPLE, SOCIETY, that would constitute a general democratic value, protection or foundation, universal platform for the essential values of freedom, democracy, development opportunities or the existence of education, culture, fundamentally, state. And there were probably no such forces, nor generally „from below,” from free civil rights (in fact, in the flowing stream, the country was not prepared for such a thing, so what remained were these transformations of „round-table” diplomacy, in the first phases limited in terms of fully democratic elections, but somehow democratized, and then without official muzzles, perhaps with burdens, but probably increasingly farther from at least unambiguously authoritarianism, in other ways, or not filling the gaps in the overall state or national capacity, at most weaker, individual actions, disappearing, etc., more dominated by levels of differences, fragmentation, rather, and petty victories, also on the pretext of so-called freedom of speech, mediocrities and undereducated, „smart,” even riffraff, took advantage of the situation and filled the available „spaces,” including public ones in general. Besides the initial nature of the changes, there were some „inequalities” in access and implementation, a little regarding privatization, a little probably staffing associated with the earlier arrangements, Poland was not actually better off than it was, but somehow, in general, the changes were related to positive influences, perhaps mainly the inflows from the West and somehow liberation from the previous clearly totalitarian-authoritarian system towards democratization.
After that „Round Table” there was in fact no sufficient stage of separation from the „unclear past” probably much longer than the agreed 1 term, there was no establishment of a logical consensus for a logical development of democracy, freedom, transparent information distinguishing between law and politicians, orientations, etc., implementation towards democracy, but rather the influence of politicians, „orientations” secondary to the law or activities according to the „famousness” of different or – that competences of „different” stakeholders (e.g. from the period of „communism”, BUT the filling of seats probably did not reach the level of self-independence, full independence, separating abilities, skills from so-called merits (e.g. that someone is more certain for political reasons, CONNECTION WITH THE Round Table, distinguishing oneself politically, in a party earlier).
^^^^^^^^^^^_________________
[[[ regarding the category of logical-definitional law*, about which the writer of this article formulated the basics comprehensively, briefly, and synthetically (already!)
– phenomena, sequences of phenomena, and influences, but what was certainly lacking was an arrangement, a formulation independent of so-called arrangements, limitations, e.g., due to different tastes or worldviews) – the need/s for organizing basic, clear logical regulations, definitionally, logically, regarding a NEW, LOGICAL, INCLUDING DEFINITIONAL FORMULATION, REGARDING THE CRITERION of the definition and concept (which is contained in the aforementioned article „On Law and Rights…”, posted and available at: bryzy2.com) for people in democracies and generally everywhere, and logical consistency with truth for sensible, beneficial changes or transformations).]]]
After a long time, the writer has now concluded that there are various negatives, somehow related to populist and corrupt practices. facts, in Poland, absurdly absurd divisions have somehow formed, such as the option of separating the influence of progressive, developmental righteousness in general society, probably mixed with hypocrisy about access to „material goods”, which is probably what the former so-called „people” could use to make their influence there. hardliners, and the soured, backward „village, village-likeness”, people not very bright regarding progressiveness and development, defining themselves as, for example, conservatives or adhering to law and justice, wanting to be in power, who, in addition to this, without a religious, de facto religiosity dimension as publicized in the state, felt not in their own land, freedom or values, environment, such usurpers wanted in their own way „added value” and this as in a state of law, and in addition the writer does not know how many, but there were also such, who were servile during the so-called „communism” earlier and probably more sophisticated, also, for example, accustomed to authoritarianism as a security (e.g., as: that „know how to deal”). – Such a mixture, the so-called or supposedly modest, narrow-minded authoritarians (e.g. backyarders), or that from the context: modest and righteous, conservatives and – that knowing life or knowing about arrangements or tactics, it was probably a „depth charge” that forced the return of religion to schools, probably with the help of hypocritical or simply usurping „women” even from the Civic Platform (PO) or superiors who agreed with them or incited them, they allowed religious symbols to be hung in offices, hospitals, etc. (probably under the hypocritical image that it was tolerance and humanism for the „needy”, apart from, of course, such usurpatory ringleaders as Kaczyński, who de facto wanted – and achieved a lot – his backyard from my country, without considering my rights to freedom from religion, which, regarding truth in the rational-logical sense, is an irrational scope, devoid of confirmation of the content of religion as consistent with the truth!
All the more talented, creative, and imaginative youth began to leave Poland en masse, and culture, creativity, and freedom largely left the country with them. (!!!) (This was at the turn of the 21st century!), and the cultural and social climate, including the diverse color palette, began—for the writer—to reek of emptiness, a stagnant, consumerist, so-called mundane atmosphere. Perhaps only the clothes were diverse, and that was at least from free imports!
– What is significant is the weak, usurping, and corrupt state of the Polish judiciary (it is truly appalling, and the only response to this is: Larum!), the weakness of the constitutional wording, even incorrect regarding the logical-definitive* conformity with the truth of some of the constitutional content, which the author of this post writes more about logically (logical-definitive* and ad logical-definitive* ____________on his WordPress website: bryzy2.com_________
Under Kaczyński, the author felt besieged, somewhat paranoid, by the rule of religious scum under the guise of freedom (there were no safeguards for public law at that time, and the government was full of religious people! However, in psychiatric hospitals, for example, there was no observance of humanist laws at all, but medieval-violent actions, etc., with figures of the crucified Jesus! They didn’t dare to use emblems?!), but ignoring logical definition, for example, in the sphere of rights and statuses of those entitled to In public spaces, for example, when he turned on TVP 1 on Sunday mornings, an image of sectarian indoctrination emerged, driven directly into the face by a sectarian in a Catholic russet, who de facto thrust some sectarian teachings directly into the writer’s face, even though the writer expected something from the world he lived in, not from the territory of a religious sect, which, for the writer, invaded the writer through a public, general medium, ad status logical, then with authoritarian-irrational, as religious – ad factum – in religious-religious „texts” of authoritarian influences and suggestions.
Ad logic, also ad history – was and is a synonym, a manifestation, and a vehicle for authoritarianism, backward to actual, true freedom and against protection against claims that were at least not confirmed as truthful. In the Polish People’s Republic, admittedly somewhat authoritarian-totalitarian regarding the medium. „Soviet-Marxist” in its ideology, however, a logical distinction was made that religion is, at most, a matter of personal choices or convictions, beliefs. However, there was clarity about the lack of logical confirmation of content, as (mainly referring to dogmas (of so-called faith) consistent with truth, and in this sense, without the status of confirmation of content, as consistent with truth, that is, as recognized as logically sanctioned, as legitimate within logical scopes, as legitimate as general public goods, which applies in a state based on the principles of not going beyond provable content as entitled to some entitlement to the status of inclusion in the so-called sphere, scope, status – as content or values of general public or public!
Regarding truth, in the critical, rational-logical approach to the criterion of truth, logical, logically (log.-def.*), there were many actions (including certainly influences) at least against logical-cognitive mental functions, reaching beyond the criteria of truthfulness irrationally, allowing them, cultivating them, manifesting, for example, public spheres under the guise of teaching or correcting people in their errors, i.e. in correcting their mistakes, weaknesses, faults or ignorance, or as cultural traditions or the history or tradition of Polish culture.
From the perspective of critical reason, in the Polish People’s Republic there was a dogmatic lie about progress under the banner of forced labor and friendship with the Russian neighbor, who supposedly imposed a „wise dogma” or protection from the rotten, corrupt West. But generally, the writer could treat this, including logical definitions, as a kind of historical fate, coercion after the „boot of Stalin” or the Soviets. Ad rationalism or critical reason could feel healthy but persecuted, while these religious forces, for example, somehow constituted, in the writer’s eyes, completely irrational repressions of a completely irrational, authoritarian, even dark-minded, sectarian nature, completely disconnected from logic, from the logical-rational, logical-mental nature of man in the world of phenomena in which people live on Earth!
But for several decades after the Round Table Talks, the writer has been exposed to involutionary and irrational religious forces as if they were private interests, organized and operating in a completely irrational and medieval manner (i.e., a usurper lord, the mayor his executor, the guardian and the parish priest, pushing irrational, „otherworldly” indoctrination, with its authoritarian notions, images, etc.). And in such circumstances, I, a human being, as if I had or were supposed to have logically justified rights—that I live in a free country, the rights of personal and civil freedom, logical rights ad category of the environment within the legal and public sphere. (!!!) They were trampled on, ignored in favor of the influence of dogmas that operate irrationally and do not transcend them.
Currently, many fundamental errors are overlapping and hidden under various forms of so-called populisms.
The writer rightly felt ignored regarding truth in the logical and rational sense, i.e., justification. His civil and public rights. More detailed information regarding logical law, corruption, and several manifestations can be found on his website: https://bryzy2.com
From what the author of this article-post has noted here, it follows that the development and even saving of democracy in his country (and indeed in the world!) requires certain significant changes, which have not been explicitly undertaken by any party or authority, at least not clearly, unambiguously, or explicitly.
The author sees that FOR CORRECTIVE CHANGES, there are essential, essential conditions for realization, credibility, and implementation, for freedom and rights to function, a law that benefits people, but freedom, legitimate freedom, should be protected by logical law, and its conditions should be clearly, concisely, and synthetically, that is, comprehensively, in terms of its foundations and scope. The author of this article-post has innovatively formulated this in terms of its foundations and scope. Logically (log-def.*) regarding rationally and logically verifiable criteria of truthfulness, and this applies to both individuals and their collectives, and Their privacy and their rights in collective, state, and public contexts, as well as constitutional formulations, so that the law is both secured and protects people in accordance with the law and the truth, including in terms of its beneficial nature, constituting a general benefit, regarding both individual people and the collective of people, based on the common characteristics of the species (or the human race), and regarding diversity and freedom, in the entire multiplicity of phenomena, the world (something like: liberties for all, freedom for all, but in accordance with reason, with the truth regarding logical law (log.-def.*).
Regarding general logical law, consistent with truth (log.-def.*), in Poland (including in the significant historical conditions of Poland, Poland), such safeguards have not been implemented. Fundamentally, their absence in Poland is glaring – (temporarily ignoring the world as a whole) – and it is important, essential for repair, for repair, for the important data formulated by the author of this article to reach citizens and authorities en masse, not only in Poland(!), ….. significant changes in the approach of citizens to understanding the scope of their rights and recognizing fraud, false suggestions or ignorance, which constitute the potential for benefits and general profit for people.
The author sees the gaps, sees clearly what changes need to be made and implemented to at least introduce true, by definition, actual freedom and democracy for Poland, that is, for Poles, for all Polish citizens in the context of internal changes in the country, in the Polish state, for the people, for society. (But as for the sensibility of these changes, he also sees the sense, the importance of reaching these rather simple data, of grasping the logic of the truth regarding the General Fundamental Law, which he himself defined, formulated a content that protects people around the world, which can constitute, for those who understand this principle, a permanent, as it were, algorithm for application in a wide variety of areas, to a wide variety of specific topics!
– So, in order to repair Polish society, the state system for the people and the Polish state – to overcome the dominant dominance or the generally significant impact of environmental, ideological, and political contradictions in their diversity, often contradictory or conflictual, levels of discord or separation, or as intra-national conflicts, precisely regarding levels, for example, or levels of political orientation or worldviews, which often shaped parties and became sources of conflict, and not, for example, some additions to the state as a whole, and none of which actually matter (is it post-Round Table reliance, business, or general hypnosis?!). The author encourages you to familiarize yourself with the important content contained on his website (bryzy2.com), with particular emphasis on the algorithm, as it were, contained in his study-post titled: „On Law and Rights in General…”.
– a movement, a platform, or platforms of citizens should be established independent of the party, civic, preferably cooperating in some way in important contexts of citizens, who would engage in work on important details and topics. However, it is also important that representatives of the authorities also engage in positive aspects or contexts, to the extent that they can make the right decisions for the general public.
the topic, scope(s), and basic scopes of the construction of the Polish state from a legal perspective, including organizational aspects, but taking into account the BASIC GENERAL LAW, logical, including Logical in terms of definition, and about such a law, universal even for all humans, as representatives or, for example, as phenomenal „phenomena,” defined as belonging to the human species or genus, according to biological-mental classification, consisting in total of individual „individual beings” with specific characteristics that distinguish them from representatives or phenomena of so-called various „kingdoms in nature,” or more generally: any phenomenal nature, existence in „Being,” „Existence,” existence in existence in general.
About such a fundamental, logical (logically and definitionally*), GENERALLY AND ULTIMATELY BENEFICIAL LAW, its foundations and scopes, as the only fully legitimate, ultimately evidential criterion regarding such tools as logical-critical reason regarding logical consistency with truth, which criterion is ultimate for humans, for all people, and also clear, understandable, communicable, and unambiguous in its foundations, that is, verifiable regarding consistency with truth and law. Legitimate for humans, for people rationally, even against the criteria of ontology and epistemology, the author of this article-post has formulated a synthetic, fundamental whole that can serve as a criterion and, as it were, an algorithm for people’s orientation regarding rights and law.
The author of this article-post formulates the essential, comprehensive and synthetic content of the fundamental, GENERAL LAW, which can save people, including all of humanity, and is logical (including in terms of definitions). Ultimately, it is also—de facto—the only law beneficial to humans in terms of honesty, for all people in the strict sense, constituting a fair PROFIT for all, regarding truth, and its legitimacy inherent in its properties, even against ontology and epistemology, as the author demonstrates in his study-post entitled: „On Law and Rights in General…”, available on the author’s website: https://bryzy2.com
MM