Ad situation in the world. (February 20, 2026)
Currently, after the collapse of the authoritarian totalitarian system of the so-called „Soviet Union,” or the so-called „Soviet Union,” and the transformation of the former Eastern Bloc countries into officially democratic states (even formally, in Russia), countries closer to the West, such as Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, etc., having long historical experience with Russia, joined the EU and NATO.
In Russia, however, its traditional approach, dark nature, and aversion to the West as such, as well as totalitarian tendencies (Chechnya), began to manifest quite quickly. Initial hopes and predictions of positive relations with the West, however, gradually worsened year by year, and the initial image of Russia as a democracy faded. In Russia, power was largely influenced by past totalitarian forces, and the West lacked sufficient guarantees of democratic change, despite some attempts at agreement. Meanwhile, Russia focused on strengthening its position towards the former Soviet Union.
Poles and various neighbors, such as Slovakia, the Czech Republic, and others, naturally wanted to decisively distance themselves from Russian influence, sensing freedom and ties to the West. Russia, meanwhile, began its imperialist policy, attacking Georgia after Chechnya and, finally, Ukraine, newly established through democratic elections, free from Russian influence. It became a fully independent democratic state with its own political system, and was recognized as such politically and internationally.
The attack on Ukraine became a drastic factor because Ukraine borders the democratic West, and not only did the West see the totalitarian usurper, who attacked Ukraine up close and unannounced, just as a criminal bandit attacks an innocent passerby in broad daylight, in full view of a crowd, but also rapes its citizens as if they were women, and the crowd is powerless to do anything because the bandit has a weapon that will kill anyone who tries to neutralize or immobilize him. – This is no longer the faraway or remote East for Europeans, which is not perceived as a completely real and directly present place. Ukraine was/is trying to connect with Western free democracies, but the world was surprised by a sudden, unannounced and total military attack, and Putin is/was trying to explain it fraudulently and usurpingly regarding the reasons for this attack (e.g., Ukraine’s raison d’état) and the nature of his criminal and bandit attack. Currently, the dominant policy of Russia is that of a de facto authoritarian-totalitarian and imperialist-authoritarian state, and the image of the West is/was formed there as corrupt, in opposition or as a counterpoint to the promotion of Russia as morally healthy, even as sacred to Russians, with its „homeland” as sacred, but also despising other states or nations, portraying them as enemies, either because they are corrupt as people or because of the rottenness of their social systems, etc., however, groundlessly regarding more objective fundamental rights or international laws, while they themselves are simply undemocratic strongmen, rapists, bandits, criminals who rely on violence without regard for fundamental rights, their elections, even supposedly democratic, were controlled, controlled, forced to make citizens choose those desired by those in power, etc. They created images of the supposed corruption of the West, trying to divert attention from such details, such as the undemocratic nature of its own general elections, i.e. something like „you citizens do not know who or what can help you, but that the authorities know.” In place of values, the freedom of individual people with their libertarian foundation of free choice (as well as selective methods for the emergence of candidates with a significant power and the monster of criminally usurpatory actions, even de facto blackmailing the world, which was somewhat previously protected from war or nuclear annihilation.
Russia’s weakness is the lack of culture among its citizens, or rather its society, of education about democracy, its nature, and the foundations of evil that cuts off fundamental human rights at their foundations, namely that: every citizen is born free and has a fundamental right to freedom (regarding the category of logic (logically and definitionally*), has innate dignity (so, for example, it should not be destroyed by forcing the cult of dependence on others), and also that everyone is equal before/with respect to the law, so that people should not rely on authoritarian, totalitarian influences – the genitive part, also probably the fact that if someone has democratic awareness, knowledge, or such reflexes, they are vulnerable to These dominant forces, threatened by the essentially dominant principles of usurpation, irrationality, or simply authoritarian-totalitarianism.
– But the problem of transition for Russia is not simply related to the inertia of people’s habits, but to the fact that those in power (or control) are not free, democratic people, but totalitarian-authoritarian ones. Even if only because of their own powerlessness, they are still generally destroying even their own people with a completely usurpatory desire, not only for totalitarian-authoritarian imperialist domination, but also, for example, the fact that this greed for power first spilled out within Russia into a specific system, and eventually, in relations with other countries, precedents began to emerge: Chechnya, Georgia, Ukraine, etc., – regardless of the West, which probably didn’t force anything on Russia, de facto adopting only a defensive stance, often somewhat delayed, in response to Putin’s suspicious moves. After the Russians’ attack on Ukraine, it could at best support the attacked. _____
After the West’s impotence and helplessness were revealed during Biden’s term, newly elected President Trump also failed to end impunity and further crimes committed by Russia or Putin against or in Ukraine. Instead, he allowed for the passage of secondary categories, albeit ones that were also painfully detrimental to the unambiguous solidarity of the NATO defense alliance (EU and the US together), and for various „moderation” attempts, which began to take on the increasingly dark hallmarks of an anti-democratic aura that began to engulf both the West and the wider world. He began to allow Putin into the so-called „Elite,” and now even more, depriving the West of the unequivocal authority and strength of democratic principles. (According to the author, instead of adhering to fundamental values as a raison d’état to maintain democracy and solidarity, or as a consequence of its principles, he himself began to undermine them, manifest them, or reveal himself, and to consider himself an individual not mature enough to fully consider the values of democracy or its conditions.)
Instead of maintaining the distinction between democracy and authoritarian totalitarianism, Trump himself has somehow begun to manifest it, and totalitarians like Putin, perhaps seemingly differently than the Chinese Xiao, but also others.
and in this system, true values are replaced by images of the prosperity of the USA as a „separate island,” some regime-violent impositions that are conflicting for citizens and the democratic climate, acting without data or intentions presented as a logical plan. At the same time, the context of his actions, attitudes, more authoritarian, uncontrollable, or dominating power of elites and the wealthy, taking away areas of power, influence, general democratic achievements in favor of some unjustified situation, undemocratically introduced changes under the banner of essentially anti-democratic movements (illegal, logically-def.*, in democracies), and is also mainly, somehow neutrally presented, – only – that he returns to the power relations of the 19th century, without sufficient observations. negativity, unjustification, and a usurping context in relation to what people have already achieved between the 20th and 21st centuries, when democracy, law, and humanism have already achieved enormous progress, manifestations, and functioning climates of freedom (positive, ad categories of law/rights log.-def.*) [(ad law/rights, general everyday life or the state of law, democracy, types of activities in which the climate of unambiguity about the type/types of transformations somehow does not prevail, clearly manifesting itself ad facts by distancing from or violating the law/rights due to people, generally logical-def.* rights and ad democracy, and generally regarding the situation in the world, tragically (ad general situation), antidemocratically – ad the entire state of the world, elevating such individuals or nature, their factual status regarding law logical-def.* ad truth) above law/rights log.-def.* Corruption is or was somehow permitted, tolerated, or smuggled in under various guises.]
_________
*
* – explanation ad asterisk at The term „logical-definitive*” is included as a significant term on the author’s website (https://bryzy2.com) in an article-post, innovative, indeed synthetically formulated (short, synthetic, and comprehensive), which, according to the author, constitutes the basis and potential for all positive, beneficial, and truthful changes for people, ultimately for all humanity. (!) The title of the article-post: „On Law and General Laws…” (page: https://bryzy2.com), under the explanation of the asterisk – *.
_________
Still ad Trump – so he, under the slogan or cover – or de facto, that although elected as a Republican for president, did not have and does not have the right/rights log.-def.* to act unlawfully in a democracy. (The logical division into the Republican and Democratic parties essentially means, by definition, that the context of the state’s organization and its safeguards is what counts in a republic as the basic structure of the state, while the definition of democracy is what counts in a republic—the author adds: the critical criterion: logically.—by definition*—which is the basis for clarifications or further definitions logically regarding various details, as constitutional rights of the people, humanistic (meaning logically beneficial to the people, both fundamentally and generally).
So Trump, as president, has no rights consistent with the logical constitution of democracy (which he is supposed to serve and which is why it elected him), which allow him to engage in anti-democratic, corrupt, authoritarian-totalitarian, or usurpatory actions. He is officially supposed to represent the United States as a democratic state, not a totalitarian, authoritarian, or populist one. Regarding the definition logically, the truth is true. If there are exceptional situations or those defined as special, he should be guided by logic, humanistic, and not totalitarian-authoritarian as if he could not act in accordance with the law, the rights of the people.
[(Here’s a common example from Poland – from the author’s memory – of how the police operated at least as early as the late 1970s – if a drunk person was causing a disturbance, he was gently put into a car by the police, even if he „struggled” without being beaten. The police took care of this. Nowadays, in many countries, such a delinquent is often beaten, shamefully humiliated by forcing absolute obedience. Back then, it would probably have been an insult to such services to beat, for example, someone not fully sane for his resistance or reflexes! – this is how the author saw many actual situations, sometimes even from TV)].
Trump, under the guise of representing the democratically free United States, began to undermine the very foundations of democratic values in favor of pursuing agreements and commercial and material pressures in various situations, often violating and destroying the status of conventions or, by definition, his own status as a representative of the US or regarding allies, e.g., NATO. in areas such as focusing on so-called monetization over fundamental values, and in its territorial claims, not consulting or debating with allies (NATO) or the West, holistically, democratically regarding the economy and existing fundamental values, but placing them in situations that suddenly contradict the general ideas of Western politics/policies, and consorting with Putin and other anti-democrats, suggesting the importance of trade and material goods on the basis of recognizing totalitarians and terrorists with respect to the law of logic (log.-def.*), with whom it tries to establish a supposed balance (is it the division of shares -?!? or training or taming the beast? – so far, Trump (is it just for the ad of the world?) has lost!!! –
– – that these values have begun to turn out or appear to be irrelevant, i.e. secondary: „to” – „current” – „balance of power” or that : „in the current balance of power”, – ad: and replacing values important to the connection, e.g.: „that needed”.
– It is certainly significant that totalitarian-authoritarian forces (including groups) hold power or are in power, and their influence paralyzes clear or independent thought, and societies are not always sufficiently prepared or enlightened regarding details (e.g., from generalized views) or capable of eliminating or purging anti-constitutional, usurpatory, or harmful, negative phenomena, actions of the authorities, or forces in general.
–
_____
And the author of this article-post sees the solution, the force for repair or „healing” in the DISSEMINATION of data, in education, and in addressing the details ABOUT THE BENEFITS, relevance, and strength of the foundations(!!!) of this UNIVERSAL LAW, the basic content of which the author has already formulated in the above-mentioned (indicated) and in his article on the website also mentioned (indicated).
Certainly, „The greatest force should be the Civic Platforms, wherever possible, including gathering people on this important issue concerning the ambiguities, falsehoods, frauds, and powerlessness that exist regarding the content and functioning of law worldwide, in one’s own country, etc. Credible media should be a complement, for example, in addition to describing an event, its thematically relevant scope.
_____
Western democracies, of course, sided with Ukraine, but the US, step by step, either yielded (especially under Trump) to Putin and Russia, perhaps fearing a nuclear threat (then there is the context for the so-called: skillful handling of a terrorist or a hijacker), or perhaps more so, at least ultimately, to succumbing to, being exposed to, the usurpatory actions of Trump, who, instead of standing unequivocally on the side of fundamental democratic values and human rights, began to move towards exchanging these values for material and territorial gains, becoming somehow more like Putin and the Chinese totalitarian-authoritarian communist, collaborating with values. Material (including even territorial allies) at the expense of the values of democracy, its rights, and achievements, elevating them above the scale of freedom and democracy with its positive influence in the world to a degree, a state, as if ennobling the system as one of the three main forces representing power and activity, in which it itself also becomes authoritarian-totalitarian or at least weakens the NATO alliance, the democratic world,
– and in which true values are replaced by images of the prosperity of the USA as a „separate island,” some regime-violent impositions that are conflicting for citizens and the climate of democracy, acting without data and intentions presented as a logical plan. At the same time, the context of its actions, attitudes, more authoritarian, uncontrollable, or dominating power of elites and the wealthy are revealed, taking away areas of power, influence, and general democratic achievements in favor of some unjustified situation, undemocratically introduced changes under slogans that are essentially anti-democratic. movements (illegal against law log.-def.* in democracies), and is also mainly presented as somehow neutral, – only- it goes back to the power relations of the 19th century, without sufficient observations against the negativity, unjustification, usurpatory context in relation to what people have already achieved between the 20th and 21st centuries, when democracy, rights, humanism have already achieved enormous progress, manifestations and functioning climates of freedom (positive against the categories of law/rights log.-def.*) –
– and (against law/laws, general everyday life or the state of law, democracy, types of activities in which an atmosphere of unambiguity about the type/types of change somehow does not prevail, clearly manifesting itself against facts by distancing from or violating the law/rights due to people, generally the laws of logic-def.* and against democracy and generally regarding the situation in the world, tragically (against the general situation), anti-democratically – against the entire state of the world, elevating such individuals or nature, their factual status regarding the law of logic-def.*, against truth) above the law/laws of logic-def.* Corruption is somehow permitted, tolerated, or smuggled in under various guises.
_________
*
* – the explanation for the asterisk next to the term „logical-definitive.*” is included on the author’s website (https://bryzy2.com) in an article-post, which is innovative, indeed synthetically formulated (short, concise, and comprehensive), and which, according to the author, constitutes the basis and potential for all positive, beneficial, and truthful changes for people, ultimately for all humanity. (!).
_________
And also for Trump – so he, under the guise or cover – or de facto, that although elected as a Republican president, did not and does not have the right/rights logically-definitively* to act unlawfully in a democracy. (Logically, the division into the parties: __ republican and __ democratic, is essentially based – by definition – on the fact that for the republic as the basic structure of the state, the context of the organization of the state and its safeguards is important, and for the term democracy, what counts is the laws of democracy – the writer adds: for the critical criterion: log. – by definition* – which is the basis for further clarifications or further definitions logically regarding various details, as constitutional rights of people, humanistic (i.e. logically beneficial for people both fundamentally and generally).
Trump, therefore, as president, does not have the rights consistent with the logical constitution of democracy (which he is supposed to serve and which is why it elected him) that allow him to engage in anti-democratic, corrupt, authoritarian-totalitarian, or even usurping actions. He is officially supposed to represent the United States as a democratic state, not a totalitarian, authoritarian, or populist one, as defined logically ad truth. If there are exceptional situations or those defined as special, he should be guided by logic, humanism, not totalitarian-authoritarianism, as if he could not act in accordance with the law and the rights of the people. [(here’s a common example from Poland – from the writer’s memory – of how the police operated at least in the late 1970s – if a drunk person was causing a disturbance, he was gently put into a car as a precaution, even if he „struggled”, without being beaten – the service took care of it, and nowadays in many countries such a delinquent is often beaten, shamefully humiliated by forcing absolute obedience by force. In the past, it would probably have been an insult to such services that, for example, they beat someone who was not fully sane for his resistance or reflexes! – this is how the author saw many actual situations, sometimes also from TV)].
Trump under the guise of representing the Democratic Free St. United States (but also by changing the arguments to looking or suggesting de facto from the position of its military and economic power, at the expense of the contexts of justice of the category: DEMOCRACY, interchangeably with the category of STATUS of the reason of state not only for itself, but also for those like Putin, began to undermine in some(!) details the carrier, carriers of democratic values, in favor of striving for agreements and commercial and material pressures in various situations, often violating, destroying the statuses of conventions or definitionally its status as a representative of the USA or in relation to allies, e.g. from NATO, in such areas as focusing on monetization, above basic values, and in its territorial claims, not consulting or not taking up with allies (from NATO) or as with the West, holistically, democratically regarding the economy and basic values that already exist, but putting them in situations that suddenly contradict the general ideas of politics, policies of the West, associating with Putin and others (e.g. not having the log.-def. status* powers as legal representatives, i.e., with totalitarians or totalitarian-exposed rulers – trying to create a platform as a dissertation ad UN, but in this case not having any sufficient formal status regarding international law or countries: democracies) or suggesting the importance of trade and material goods on the principles of recognizing totalitarians and terrorists with respect to the law of logic (log.-def.*), with whom he is trying to establish something or to deal with them. – This is similar to the saying: if you don’t know what to do with an intruder, hire him, but in this case, ad essential content,
Trump does not have a status that would logically (log.-def.*) suffice to run his own business, under the title of „making order” or as a „Peace Council.” Besides, as you can see, „Putin has repeatedly deceived him” (!!!), as, for example, the President of the United States or as a guarantor of the United States, that he will be the head of others in organizing his idea, as a decision-maker among various „sorts” of „representatives” of other countries or their powers (actually, probably the rulers of those countries – but often – ad not democratic – but not having the status log.-def.* as legal representatives of those countries).
– This is also ad, – „that these values have begun to prove irrelevant” or ad: – „changing the relevant values to the scale…?! and „so who (what?) is the controller?”
If someone suggests to me the significance of something (especially their own action) without full – as ad, whole – justified confirmation (logically, log.-def.*), then I know I’m dealing with with authoritarian power (behind this, a totalitarian, somehow usurping force may be hidden).
As a free person, I’m not sure what or who governs, and trusting and being passive (sometimes it can be ignorance) to such a person can be disastrous (in the case of a pilot, regular checks are performed to assess their fitness), but regarding the president, I think they’re being scrutinized.!!! He has no right to be or act like, for example, the owner of the USA, but is supposed to represent the USA, i.e., the United States, etc. – Here, the author sees it as logical that, above all, effective logical and legal control should be in place, – log., – def.*, because that’s what protects, for example, the citizens of one’s own country (e.g., as a republic). !!!
_____
– and in Poland, it was Sikorski (publicly, as Deputy Prime Minister) who said that Jesus rules in Poland(!!!). Sikorski should be treated as an unlawful, usurpatory statement. This does not entitle him to hold office in the formal sense,
[He expressed himself, spoke untruthfully regarding the logical, logical-definitional* criteria of truthfulness, and at least also regarding the law of log.-def* unlawfully (and which law of log.-def* is truthful and lawful regarding ultimately critical and rational criteria, as demonstrated, justified, and presented by the author in his work-post entitled: „On Law and Laws in General…” on his above-mentioned website, where the explanation of the asterisk is also given: *. Also/ Even considering that the Polish constitution contains a provision specifying citizens from the differentiating side in the context of their reliance on the highest values as from religion, it is rather [(„in/from the great God”), it does not write „Absolute” there – and how ridiculous, or rather authoritarian, the term „Highest Absolute” would be!] or citizens’ reliance on the highest values as from other sources. This provision still has its drawbacks (maybe „a split devil,” and there is certainly no definition, no definitiveness, and civil rights in a logically (log.-def.*) unambiguous or unambiguously formulated sense.
Logically unambiguous, log.-def.*, detailed, and correctly formulated, neither Sikorski nor the „biblical Jesus” have the formal, factual right(s) to rule in Poland, and logically-definitionally* recognize their legitimacy to rule in Poland(!). [Neither of them meets the log.-def.* criteria for legitimacy to rule in Poland!].
And law is law (ad truth, logically formulated law). For the author, the critical controller is this law consistent with truth, i.e., what he technically (technically) calls logical-definitional*, to distinguish it from, for example, the category of so-called „false logical propositions.”
_____
– !!! –
And what is desirable FOR REPAIRING the system or law in the state – according to the writer – is the gathering of people, citizens, meetings at levels or in the context of civic platforms, gathering and co-communication and co-coordination. Topics such as: General, Universal law (formulated fundamentally by the author of this article-post) as a logical (log-def.*) holistic basis already formulated by the author (basically and synthetically, holistically regarding the Laws and regarding the Truth in those already formulated (by the author), regarding its benefits (profitability) for people, its nature of securing freedom, life and development of people, for humanity as a human species, de facto, what, according to the author, is contained logically, logically-definitively*, perhaps differently than the author of this post has already formulated in his workshop, although no one else has publicly formulated, at least as precisely as the author, or so unambiguously and communicatively regarding the officially treated or defined state of the term „logic.” Of course, one can also formulate (ad technically) a logical law in the sense that it refers to true logic, but the author also took into account that ultimately logic cannot be false! With the sense of the possibility of logical, yet false, propositions, there is a fact.
( With the perception of the possibility of logical propositions as either true or false, there arises—in the author’s sense, perception—a certain impurity, opacity, and this could perhaps even be called something like: an error in the logarithm!).
*****???///// Law, log-def.* laws for people that are logically consistent with truth and law, i.e., and in this way also consistent with the common nature of all people [(as the author of this post demonstrates in his aforementioned work-post available on his website mentioned above] cannot be limited or truncated by any orientations, whether religious (religious) or ad-libs of variously defined tastes (e.g., under the title: right-winger, left-winger, centrist, conservative, anarchist or leftist, and even in fact: American Republican – „ultimately” – although, and this is probably the so-called implicit – self-defense does not have to take into account so-called values in the extreme).
with a multitude of people, somewhere in relation to or in the de facto multitude, looking objectively or generally, one can also add – as legitimate, somehow in or regarding permitted pluralism – in relation to the very context of multitude or multiplicity in the context of freedom, log.-def.* entitled.*****???////////
_____
As an addition, but as an example of fraudulent practices under the guise of freedom of initiative in democracies, the author concludes by pointing out that to protect human rights, and indeed the rights of people in democratic countries, citizens should also have some legal guarantees against, for example, millionaires like Zuckerberg (from the US),
who, under the guise of creating technical support for social media platforms, can control their users and exclude (disable) anyone they want. For example, they can exclude a Facebook user (Meta) with the accusation that they violated the community’s rights by including community rules, but without providing details. The user has no real recourse. This Meta—indeed, can regulate this at their own discretion, just as a „master” kicks out a „customer or tenant without their rights of self-defense,” or just as a guy is kicked out „like a scumbag” from a private club, simply by suggesting that it’s not for them!!!
Since this Zuckerberg, as the owner of „Meta” under the slogan or banner of a place for communities, social platforms (from all over the world!) allows himself (or his employees?) to set such precedents. (The author himself fell victim to such an action on the part of this „Meta”, formerly FB, which has a near monopoly on „social platforms” with many millions of participants, „customers”!), it is probably necessary to somehow inspectorate, legally, platform-wise, citizen-wise check this Zuckerenberg, because there is definitely something corrupt there regarding the law log.-def.*!
_____
***
The author wishes to draw attention to, DRAWS ATTENTION to/WANTS TO NOTIFY about the existing, significant BLOCKAGE of true, actual log.-def.* rights, an outright obstacle [looking critically from the perspective of the context of truth, ad log.-def.* criteria and law, rights, and ad these (log.-definition*) criteria] regarding the legal, state-public, and social protections due to people BEFORE THIS BLOCKAGE, AN OBSTACLE AGAINST THE LEGITIMATE freedom for people, for humanity, regarding the human and civil rights due to people,
– and also expanded to the extent of a truly powerful, authoritarian-totalitarian nature of influence, injected even against public and state phenomena, through, for example, TV or the internet, to individual citizens in their homes – regardless of their own attitudes, and propagated as allegedly consistent with human rights, often even as tradition, or as supposedly culture and It is „sanctified” (or dominant in culture—that’s probably how independent or avant-garde creativity was described). It is tolerated by states or countries, like an irresistible „mantra” (a cross was hung in the state parliament!), which exists, has become irresistible, and appears de facto authoritarian, but as/as if/a „people’s need,” with its so-called rationalizations, supposedly rational (e.g., that: „and yes”) also in its nature, even though ad truth in a logical (log.-def.*) sense, i.e., regarding logical (log.-def.*) correspondence with truth, it is a force based on irrationality, has a basis, an irrational nature, and—
—does not contain in its content/contents evidence of correspondence with truth in relation to the content of its foundations, in the sense or in the sense of logically formulated formulations regarding truth.
Or, in other words, log.-definitionally*, i.e., correctly regarding truth. This supposed knowledge or science lacks the scope or basis to be defined logically as confirmed or confirmable truth, or critical logical-rational (logical-definitional*) criteria. Yet there are contradictions in the content of RELIGION, because that’s what the writer is referring to here (admittedly in the context of its influence, especially usurping the state of public or state life). The author of this article/post discussed the contradictions in the content and religious dogmas of Christianity (and the author of this post also has data or analogies regarding other religions) and the falsehood and inconsistency of this content in his post/elaboration titled: „What if someone wants to free themselves from the Christian religion but feels enslaved or doesn’t know what arguments they could have?”, on his website mentioned above. (of course, the concept of truth is never someone or something itself, but always: something about something, definition, meaning, content, as a description of something that is, in a way, the topic or the so-called object of truth… – and here, of course, what counts is the so-called logical-definitional correctness.)
In many, perhaps even most, officially democratic countries, this obstacle, this blockage regarding the law of logic, log-def.*, is related to the operation of a powerful obstacle, invisible or ignored by many people as significant or actual, real, that is, a truly existing obstacle.
This obstacle is the prevailing atmosphere, the reality, at least in the background of deception, dominating or somehow relegated as secondary, or that something valuable in societies and states is, of course, the recognition of religion, this sectarian ad truth definitional scope, supposedly culture, tradition, etc., which is at least true for Poland with its particular historical continuity (especially in the second half of the 20th century – when Poland, despite other burdens, freed itself from religiosity – about which the author wrote more on his aforementioned website in several articles/posts, probably mainly in the title „On Significant Corruption Threads after 1990”). In the current background, both Putin and Trump publicly presented themselves as followers of religion (in this case, the so-called Christian one, although in „different rites”).
Author: Mariusz Milewski
(20.2.2026y.)