I) – ARTICLE – POST:
Article – Regarding, among other things, Trump supporters’ comments about undermining the purpose of NATO with its supposed „world government” threat, from journalist Wałkuski’s description of conversations with a few of their representatives, on the occasion of a meeting (from the news on March 28, 2026—probably on MSN), but with a reference (by the author) to the details of a possible favorable victory, freedom from human evil, from people, from harmful usurpations, at least at the systemic level of people.
I)- [TRUMP PROBABLY BETRAYS THE WEST’S SOLIDARITY WITH ITS DEMOCRATIC SELF-DEFENSE THROUGH NATO.] – Earlier: …He attacked Iran without an agreement with NATO, and then began to question NATO for not obeying him, he has NO BASIS for criticizing NATO for allegedly failing to fulfill any obligations because of his first step.]
If rights are what matter most democratic(log.-def.*), this statement of that (certain) lady (voter, Trump supporter) from that meeting who „never liked NATO”, „especially after the fall of the Soviet Union” (!!!) and asked, with understanding or reasoning, what is the point of NATO’s existence? – according to the writer of this article – contains a significant usurpatory content, the meaning of this content is usurpatory in the sense that (!):
NATO is a defense pact for democratic states and their democratic values, but also for human rights in general, for people in general, in general regarding fundamental values such as freedom, dignity or equality before the law, when – especially in international spheres – this law is violated, i.e. it is a relationship intended to have the nature of securing, protecting rights, implementing self-defense or defense of rights, and these democracies, but also regarding the values of humanism and, more generally, the rights due to people, human natures in general, defense, protection of human basic values against crimes, injustices – de facto – anti-human, happening or that may happen in more distant or isolated places in the world. – So NATO is, in terms of its goals, one of the best initiatives of free citizens, societies, and democratic states, aimed at safeguarding human rights, humanity, and indeed humanity! (So „this woman or lady is a representative (or expression) of the Left advocating morality or the rights due to people, even humanity, the essential value of safeguarding or attempts to safeguard essential values in the highest sense! – and this is in the face of totalitarianisms manifesting themselves in the world (Trump also has a history of bad and ambiguous expressions of „trips” („actions”) that are essentially anti-democratic and manifest in totalitarian-authoritarian nature, and the author of this post is not sure if he will be able to extricate himself from these burdens). For now, these are evil forces, they have even begun to reveal themselves by raising „their heads,” and Trump is unable to prevent or reduce them.
In this context, we need some significant corrective actions, informational, critical and creative general civic and inspection movements, good critical Information, data relevant to education, information, and critical matters, with influences resulting from truthfulness on electoral, candidate, and judicial activities, changing these evil forces, arrangements, or systems in accordance with: significant, substantive benefits for humanity, for people. Corruption, private interests, and abuses regarding the general or substantive quality of life and the proper organization of a non-corrupt order should certainly be exposed. [For example, the owner of „Meta” should not be able to expel a participant or user of the meta from a private club without sufficient reasons (which is what meta did to the author of this post), without even the possibility of appeal and without providing a reason, only authoritatively stating that the user violated community rules and only attaching the entire general regulations!] Therefore, citizens should have critical data about abuses or significant omissions, because such an example, as the author of this post provided regarding his own situation, demonstrates the corrupt and criminal nature of this „Meta” by the American billionaire, who It preys, and under the banner of social media services for millions of people!!
*****
Those in Trump’s „Mag” movement—perhaps because of, if not greed, then fear of the aggression, the aggressiveness of this usurper Putin with a nuclear arsenal—(at least for the West, which clearly understands the difference between the value of freedom and positive profitability for people and the exploitation of totalitarian-authoritarian coercion, enslaving people, and even crimes against humanity, or that „against humanity” means a kind of terrorist-totalitarian blackmail attack.) But firstly, they should not succumb to evil themselves, secondly, they should fight it preventively, as optimally as possible, while Trump is turning a blind eye, is poorly afraid, projects himself sideways, fails the alliance and democracy, is weak, sick, or a traitor!—does not counteract unequivocally. ????? *** >>> *** — — — -???!!
—- —– — !!!! –
Regarding the Trump supporter quoted above, what really matters is the fact that Putin, despite declaring Russia a democratic state, was elected by an influential Kremlin closed circle, holding tactical and executive power during/until the elections, operating on the basis of/with the influence of/under the influence of former „security guards of the Soviet system.” He himself was a former KGB officer (the former so-called security service). (Putin was first asked if he would like to become president, and he replied: yes, I would). So even this circumstance signals that these elections – the so-called general elections – were connected with the actions of the former „Soviet services,” and not with the selection of people free from authoritarian totalitarianism in the so-called „new times, in democracy”(!).
Regarding the woman from that meeting who pointed out Russia (with its Putin(!)), she focused on the possibility of cooperation, ignoring the fact that Putin had become an international criminal, a terrorist, and a usurper who usurped the newly established, independent, and democratic Ukraine, which had gained legal independence and a democratic system (and had not had much time to fully develop either upbringing, education, or education for its own development after the many bad, negative events of its past history, where dark reflexes from the evil demons of the past were still present). Regarding the statement of this woman (presumably from the „magician” circle), the author of this post points out that, in addition to the fact that Ukraine, being involved in the war, formally—the author has not analyzed these details in detail—cannot (as far as the author is aware) be accepted as a NATO member, defending the rights of Ukraine and Ukrainians to independence and peaceful existence as a peaceful, legitimate democracy is somehow on a significant positive trajectory for NATO in general, regarding both the right of democratic states to live and be in their rights, and generally regarding the fundamental human rights to live and be.
The second woman (also a Trump supporter) said that NATO strives for a one-world government and that NATO funding should be withdrawn. She expressed (or revealed) that she would like the alliance to cease to exist(!). – { ad, – it is important for the writer to distinguish, perhaps clarify, and possibly make some corrections – if there were or are errors between the formation, the constitution of NATO, and the facts of historical manifestations, but the very idea of a possible armed defense of human rights on earth is certainly justified logically (or log.-def.*) in the face of the facts of the existence and operation/actions of usurping, totalitarian-authoritarian, evil forces that threaten or may threaten the state of humanity, whether in the case of the democratic states of the NATO alliance as a detail, or in the case of unjust and criminal, anti-human, usurping against the fundamental rights of representatives of the human species (or kind) in other places.
Regarding the woman from that meeting who pointed out Russia (with its Putin(!)), she focused on the possibility of cooperation, ignoring the fact that Putin had become an international criminal, a terrorist, and a usurper who usurped the newly established, independent, and democratic Ukraine, which had gained legal independence and a democratic system (and had not had much time to fully develop either upbringing, education, or education for its own development after the many bad, negative events of its past history, where dark reflexes from the evil demons of the past were still present). Regarding the statement of this woman (presumably from the „magician” circle), the author of this post points out that, in addition to the fact that Ukraine, being involved in the war, formally—the author has not analyzed these details in detail—cannot (as far as the author is aware) be accepted as a NATO member, defending the rights of Ukraine and Ukrainians to independence and peaceful existence as a peaceful, legitimate democracy is somehow on a significant positive trajectory for NATO in general, regarding both the right of democratic states to live and be in their rights, and generally regarding the fundamental human rights to live and be.
The second woman (also a Trump supporter) said that NATO strives for a one-world government and that NATO funding should be withdrawn. She expressed (or revealed) that she would like the alliance to cease to exist(!). – { ad, – it is important for the writer to distinguish, perhaps clarify, and possibly make some corrections – if there were or are errors between the formation, the constitution of NATO, and the facts of historical manifestations, but the very idea of a possible armed defense of human rights on earth is certainly justified logically (or log.-def.*) in the face of the facts of the existence and operation/actions of usurping, totalitarian-authoritarian, evil forces that threaten or may threaten the state of humanity, whether in the case of the democratic states of the NATO alliance as a detail, or in the case of unjust and criminal, anti-human, usurping against the fundamental rights of representatives of the human species (or kind) in other places.
Another participant in the meeting said, „Not that NATO should be disbanded, but that criticism is sometimes justified.” Yet another participant argued that Americans should leave NATO and the UN because they pay a lot but don’t help with Iran’s affairs. He ignored the blatant fact that the US attacked Iran without consulting NATO, which was in fact Trump’s own initiative. Trump, not for the first time, has also failed both the NATO alliance (e.g., Canada, Denmark, and Greenland), and the fundamental democratic rights of these countries, even NATO allies (!) [True, the Americans want to focus on their own affairs, but NATO countries responded positively to Trump’s call for better arming of their co-allies,
I) – – in the opinion of the author of this post, Trump, as an important representative of the democratic West, instead of yielding to Putin, should point out that Russia (Putin, but also ad and his „entourage”) has no legal argument logically sufficient to justify its armed attack on Ukraine (including according to log.-def.* criteria)!
*** [Perhaps it would be important, significant in this context, to make public the existing factual information about how Putin was elected president, from and among previously influential (from the „Soviet Union” period) services that knew how to manipulate events!]***
There is also context or precedent, that Trump (admittedly) „did mischief before,” but he gained victory based on the specific American Constitution by obtaining an actual majority of votes in his favor, effectively legally – if the author of the post is correct. [( What is important for a strong message, also the world, civic, human opinion from any place, informed appropriately, logically (log.-def.*) and then reacting honestly (regarding the arguments of truth (log.-def.*) – [which, by the way, could also be an opportunity to increase the influence for the whole world, understanding the essential, great significance of the content of the study prepared by the author of this post – a post, formulated logically and in definitions, about the foundations and principles, scopes of law and rights for people consistent with both truth and law, with rights, entitled: „About Law and Rights in General…”, the content of which is available on the author’s website: https://bryzy2.com ] – after, by providing relevant, substantive data, given logically, fundamentally, (log.-def.*) clearly ad nature of the precedent and important details (substantively – according to the author of this post – the arguments in favor of Ukraine clearly prove – because it, simply as a peaceful democracy, was suddenly attacked, – despite promises not to threats to Ukraine from Russia, by Russia (Putin),
– that Russia has no legal argument logically sufficient to justify its armed attack on Ukraine (including according to the log.-def.* criteria)!
[ **** – if anyone has any doubts, it’s worth checking and revising this!) to citizens around the world – the world’s public opinion) that the image of Putin and his promoters and supporters, about the value of truth and falsehood, about his criminally usurpatory aspirations to make Ukraine part of Russia, or a castrated dog, if not an ox, is an abuse and injustice against the rights of a free, separate state, including, of course, the fundamental rights of its people. (!)
This truthful and consistent with international law, or logical-definitional law*, assessment and general, universal statement about the lack of legal justifications (and therefore factual, moral, and justificational ones) should confirm the usurpatory nature of Russia’s aggressive actions against democratic Ukraine and end this war, the aggression of Russia (Russians). It is probably important to reach the leaders and „ministers” of this „moderation” imposed by them with meaningful diagnoses and justifications, along with some appropriately presented, logical, logical-definitional*, beneficial corrective actions (the author of this post sees mainly, somehow independently of these „hardliners,” or if not „ministers,” then as it were „senators,” „oligarchs,” etc.).
xxx xxxxx
It is certainly important that critical data challenging, for example, the democratic nature of Russia, pointing to important data, essentially simple conditions for: logically democracy, that is, for logical democracy (in the author’s case, even: log.-definition*), correctly, meaning actually existing and functioning, implemented into legally consistent functioning democracy, also reached the public, civic population of Russia (and other federations – generally speaking) (along with data on proper, legal democracy and the conditions and facts). They are not at all difficult to understand and take into account, for example, for preparing for new elections, for important steps to optimize and improve the law, and for the possibility of choosing possible improvements regarding at least the legal status of that society or societies.
88888
[The situation should be no worse in the US when it comes to understanding the magnitude of their own ad logistic-definitive values: „Liberty for all,” which of course means the basic context of the right to freedom, freedom as a starting point, fundamentally, which does not mean impunity or the impossibility of preventive imprisonment of a criminal. – Do not allow yourself to be led by usurpers or corrupt entities, including those „in power.”]
It is certainly important that critical data questioning, for example, the democratic nature of Russia, and therefore the actual illegality or criminality of „their authorities,” pointing to important data and abuses, in essentially simple conditions, also possibly sharing their positive experiences with other countries or societies, for: and logical democracy (in the author’s case, even: log.-def.*) ad law and truth), correctly, meaning actually existing and operating legally, correctly, implemented to function legally consistent with democracy, its essence, and nature, also reach the public, civic population of Russia (and other federations – ad generality) (together with data on proper, legal democracy and the conditions and facts). These are not at all difficult to understand and take into account, for example, in preparing for new elections, for important steps of optimization, and Regarding law and the possibility of choices for possible betterment, at least regarding the legal status of that society or societies.
Such, THESE DATA – THE PERSON WRITING THIS POST HAS FORMULATED THEM AS succinctly and essentially synthetically as possible – ESSENTIAL, CRITICAL, including for finding ERRORS, OMISSIONS, OR FALSE THINGS, FRAUD, OR CORRUPTION, – can and should be logically related (log.-def.*), according to the author of this post, to essential, synthetically formulated content, probably significantly innovative, at least regarding published content about law and rights for people (at least regarding, in CONTEXTS or in the CONTEXT OF THE ESSENTIAL CATEGORY OF TRUTH, the meaning of the aforementioned, essential content „On General Law” – also ULTIMATELY BENEFICIAL FOR PEOPLE, UNIVERSAL IN ITS ESSENCE. FOR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE HUMAN SPECIES (OR KIND) (i.e., belonging to all humanity in essence).
[This author’s content (this is not about pushing advertising, but about the essential meaning and comprehensiveness ad ranges logically!) SYNTHETICALLY AND COMPREHENSIVELY, in an ALREADY FORMULATED (by the author of this article – post), INNOVATIVE FORM (there are important explanations, data, corrections for finding, understanding AS SIMPLEST AS POSSIBLE ad ambiguity of meanings ad logic, criteria of truth) CONTENT of this article – post ABOUT GENERAL LAW (basically), UNIVERSAL for people, in the elaboration – post already mentioned above, available on the website of the author of this post. – There are data there for understanding the nature, foundations and scopes in general, while regarding the details, a lot of work should be done by sufficiently developed mentally, free from prejudices or deviations, – ad truth – and quite educated people! and possibly their executors, defining various details logically and correctly in scope – so perhaps also specialists and those supervising the accuracy of their work results.]
This important data, critical of and regarding errors, omissions, falsehoods, fraud, or corruption in the context already defined, should be taken into account and provided not only to government circles in various states and countries, but should be disseminated to citizens, not only in Russia, but generally, starting with platforms and civic movements everywhere in states and countries around the world, wherever possible.
Distance should be key here, but Trump seemed to prefer shaking hands with Putin (a criminal in power!) and debating with him. Putin seemed to have forced Trump, with his cold calculations (perhaps somewhat cynical, but in his reactions and being able to deceive him with some supplies Trump gives him! – for example, the so-called world might feel that Putin is receiving some support from Trump, giving Putin a sort of „second face,” or face, also regarding the population and propaganda of Putin’s Russia).
[Or perhaps it’s Trump’s fault or senseless weakness, who betrayed democracy and somehow NATO, the West’s potential, in favor of making deals with usurpers regarding the law of log.-def.*, and also himself displaying usurpatory-totalitarian traits and actions, and concealing this with his unpredictability, sudden, surprising moves, which, however, are somehow characterized by some ambiguity or ambiguity?] to reckon with the threat of nuclear aggression, that is, terrorist usurpation more powerful than the possibility of disarmament. that usurping aggressor, Putin, who tried and is still trying to unfairly revive the imperial power of Russia at the expense of Ukraine, – /// [( – whose capital, Moscow, was once built (financed, initiated) probably by the Vikings or their neighbors (some people from the north) „for the Russians”, although in fact they wanted to open more convenient roads, trails to the Ukrainian lands, fertile and rich, abundant in crops – de facto -, and Ukraine was located further south of the Russian lands, territories, and, moreover, not even directly adjacent to the Russian tribe (which called itself that way to distinguish them from the Ruthenians, i.e. currently Ukrainians]
Re I) – so Trump started talking, but in reality, there should be a greater force of opposition to Putin’s actions and similar or analogous ones against various totalitarianisms and authoritarianisms, especially state-based ones. Fundamental, logical arguments, correct in terms of truth, and an appropriate distance from the criminal, the usurper, are certainly important. If the usurper acts from a position of power and threatens, then this can indeed be a difficult situation; in the worst cases, the only thing that can remain is that ultimately (this is somewhat logical), evil, as evil, turns against itself.
The state is a value created by people as a result of their integration within a larger area. It can encompass many tribes, etc., but it has general fundamental principles. Its value probably lies primarily in providing uniform protection for a given area based on certain rules for all within the state, and protection, including from threats from outside the state. For the category of state to have meaning, positive value, support, or satisfaction for its subjects, that is, the inhabitants and citizens in general, the state of the state depends on the quality of the sum of the people, citizens of that area, and their lives.
Due to the specific territory and its system of organization, up to the level of statehood, which is a legitimate, justifiable way of organizing people’s lives and for people, optimality and possible optimization in the event of deficiencies, errors, or negative outcomes should be taken into account, as well as for their lives – also with justification for one’s own descendants, etc., and for positive values of continuity over time – optimizing upbringing, education, teaching, access to data, etc., in order to optimize the state and the totality of citizens and individual individuals, and to somehow secure (depending on the state and possibilities) each citizen, enabling their development, prospects, and minimum security, depending on the state and situation.
– The categories of truth and law, rights – in people – are always somehow connected with the functioning of their minds, so reliable, sufficiently justified ad truth are – – [especially in the present times of greater diversity and many facts, precedents and achieved positives] the principle of logicality, as unambiguous definition, compliance with truth (the author of this post uses the term: logical-definitional* (to distinguish it mainly from the so-called false logic, used in the embellishment of the Polish People’s Republic). [for their lives – also with justification about one’s own descendants, etc., ad positive values of continuity in time – ., optimizing upbringing, education, teaching, access to data, etc., in order to be able to optimize the state and the sum of citizens and individual individuals, securing somehow (- depending on the state and possibilities) each citizen, enabling him/her to develop, have prospects, have minimum security, depending on the state, situation.
II) – (on the other hand) – According to the law of logic-definition* (regarding truth and law, logical-definitional laws*): The state is not the source or ultimate medium for man, it is not his „God” or ultimate authority… or home (it can be built somewhere, and „homeless people”, i.e. those without a home, do exist). The state is a secondary entity, created by people for their security, protection, or cover, but it cannot be the owner of people regarding their rights. Although in extreme situations of external threats to rights or life in general, the need for self-defense may require more from citizens. These are situations when the threat is somehow common, and self-defense should also be common, especially by men capable of it, when their families and people from a significantly common environment are threatened -(- continued. This is ad to the scope of the log.def.* agreement on, for example, the State and rights). _______________________________
***** *** Perhaps this manifested itself wildly in ancient times, although initially the idea of the principle of protecting a larger number of people and territories probably prevailed, where tribes allied and united in statehood (and later there were stages of corruption or exploitation). ***** but currently, the language of communication, especially in the face of many threats and conflicts and the facts of people and societies achieving stages of individual freedom as opposed to the principles of subordination and contexts of dependence, and this to the limits of the emergence, if not of corruption or exploitation of some over others, then of „totalitarian-authoritarian enslaved societies,” etc. ***** ****
_____________________________________
Facing the fundamentally important Freedom (including electoral), the equality of people before the law fundamentally (so regarding the characteristics of the species (or human race) and having the right to development and freedom of choice consistent with the fundamental right (this is the right and logical-definitional* ad categories of critical reason), a person/people can in accordance with the fundamental right, legally), To participate/co-participate within the territory of one’s existence (state) with a legitimate (truthfully and legally) legal guarantee/protection regarding verifiable arguments (e.g., a state constitution (logical – definitional*), which is intended to express, confirm, and secure the law and rights, without blocking the possibility of optimization in accordance with truth and law and rights (logical-def.*). This arrangement and order of state content can exist, for example, as a confirmation of a republic or empire (non-totalitarian), or, for example, as a so-called commonwealth (republic), as a reference, a definition of a legal norm regarding a specific territory and its citizens, population, or nation… – that is, with its specific defining scopes.
In the construction, reconstruction, or maintenance of a beneficial democratic state in the 21st century (for the 21st century), which is consistent with the general logical-definitional law*, which is ultimately the only – de facto – beneficial actually (as the author of this article states), by assumption and principles regarding rationally and logically critical criteria and truth and law, universal laws, consistent with nature and just for people (the evidence for which he presents, demonstrates, explains in more detail in his (authorial) study-post: „About Law and Laws in General…” on the above-mentioned author’s page, – after the occurrence of significant precedents in the humanities and changes (especially in Western countries – although sometimes underestimated or ignored – but there are rationally justifiable facts, precedents), also socio-social, cultural, differentiation and understanding of pluralism in societies or as ad population (ad freedom and differentiation are citizens.) what certainly counts are the correct, correctly used criteria, hierarchies of meanings, importance (e.g. public, private, official, orderly or social), because such references and criteria refer to the correct distinctions ad organization of life, being of people in the context of the rights, protections, etc. due to people.
___
Notation: * From the study – post titled On Law and Rights in General…” (on the author’s website) – This article refers to the fact that the author of the text used the designated term with the intention of correcting the previously used term, in Marxism or simply during the times of the Polish People’s Republic, as a concept: false logic. This term (in Marxism) was meant to be the opposite of true logic, which was then understood as logically consistent with truth; its sentences and pronouncements were either true or false. However, the author takes into account here that, ultimately, logic cannot be false, i.e., inconsistent with truth, just as established factuality as truth cannot be false with respect to logic. A logical proposition is always about something, has a topic, and a proposition either based on facts or derived from beyond the facts. However, in such contexts, the author prefers to use a definition or distinction regarding the nature of such a logically constructed proposition, that is, distinguishing whether the proposition concerns real facts or is poetry, prose, fraud, or belongs to another category regarding the facts it indicates.
PS. The author of this article returns I’m reaching out to potential readers for financial support for the author and his website, as he lacks the resources to maintain and potentially develop his website. –
—- [Don’t skimp on a tenner] —–
___
April 6, 2026 author: Mariusz Milewski
– II) – ARTICLE – POST:
AD THE SITUATION IN THE WORLD – OBJECTIONS and justifications against usurpatory and harmful phenomena by people, against people, regarding or towards people, as representatives of the human species (or genus) regarding truth and law, as well as SIGNIFICANT DATA FOR CHANGING THE SITUATION FOR THE BETTER (BETTER), which can and should change the human world, people for the benefit of people, for the better BY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THESE DATA. [Addressing the need and possibility of change, changes to the situation for the better in the world, with particular emphasis on…
THIS SIGNIFICANT DATA for/for changes for the better in/in the world or regarding the world concern the needs/needs of change regarding the category of law, human rights/for people, and regarding the category (and scope) of truth.
The author of this article and post informs—wants to inform—people that he has formulated—within the scope, on the basis of (in the manner of) correct logical thinking, regarding the rational-logical criteria of correct thinking (criteria of truth)—essentially, comprehensively, generally, and fundamentally synthetically, also innovatively, a UNIFORM TEXTUAL WHOLE FORMULATION, being (as) FUNDAMENTAL, OF A BENEFICIAL UNIVERSAL LAW FOR HUMANS WITHIN THE SCOPE (ad range) OF, APPLICABLE TO, ALL OF HUMANITY, that is, to people as representatives of the human species (or genus),
In the article entitled: „ON LAW AND RIGHTS IN GENERAL REGARDING THE EUROPEAN UNION AND ITS MEMBER STATES AND FOR ALL OF HUMANITY” GENERALLY, THE CONTENT OF THIS WORK – THE POST, THE FORMULATION as a formulated text – IS AVAILABLE on the author’s website: https://bryzy2.com. This content is actually quite short, and the author believes that, given its importance and significance, it is worth reading for everyone. Fifteen minutes, maybe half an hour on average, should be enough, bearing in mind that the reader may want to return to the content several times. WITH REGARD TO THE ESSENTIAL, essential CONTENT of this indicated, detailed article, post, study – in a logically correct, rationally logical, correct according to the criteria of verifiable truthfulness and ad: meaning, content, beneficial nature of this „GENERAL LAW” (or: „UNIVERSAL LAW”) FOR PEOPLE, as worthy of recognition by people and as due to people, generally and ultimately to all representatives of the human species (or kind), THE AUTHOR OF THIS POST INFORMS, NOTIFIES AND ENCOURAGES YOU TO ACQUAINT WITH THIS CONTENT, INVITES YOU TO VISIT THE AUTHOR’S WEBSITE (internet address: bryzy2.com) – (there are also justifications in sample or contextual content in other articles – posts by the author of this post on the pages of the aforementioned author’s website).
– (STRONGEST:] 1) – Putin has attacked the free, peaceful neighboring state of Ukraine in a criminal, criminal, authoritarian-totalitarian manner, threatening it with his usurpations and violating fundamental human and civil rights. This applies to fundamental human rights and categories (including the right to life, the right to fundamental freedoms, equality before the law, and the inherent dignity of every human being) and international laws, which constitute broader territorial (global) references, international, and state-wide.
By attacking Ukraine, Putin maintains the crisis, aiming to seize and make dependent on it, i.e. his Russia) and closer neighbors, and strengthening and expanding (his influence resulting from criminal aggression, almost limitlessly throughout the world, as a significant state, but the nature of his actions and status are „impure”, they are based on the actions of oligarchic-apparatchik circles from the former casts, i.e. from the period of the so-called Soviet Union, and the democratic-legal approach has not prevailed in Russia (apart from the existence of some manifestations of superficial or formal forms. Democracy was officially announced, but elections were held under the watchful eye of soldiers, etc. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russian society has not undergone any positive, progressive changes towards a democratic society. In various deeper layers of structures, both external and internal, of Russian citizens, the old, bad attitudes and government propaganda prevail, which have their own bad, usurpatory and totalitarian influences and goals (which Trump, with his behavior, It seems to ignore general issues in many contexts), which is in the interest of totalitarian-authoritarian authorities, is convenient, because true independence and freedom (of citizens, civic, logical, of the world or in the world) would deprive them of influence, power, probably also „lucrative income,” and the so-called „image.”
It is important that some significant collective, ad collective/collectives arise (because the essential content of law is beneficial, and at the same time universal, as ultimately due to all people – WHOSE FUNDAMENTAL GENERAL CONTENT WAS FORMULATED by the collective (something perhaps ad competence, the truth of an independent forum as a starting point, reacting to an innovative, but universal, ad critical and logical reason holistically and integrally ad somehow de facto, but fully logical and definitionally correct, about the new, but fully awakened people, societies, etc. (not only in Russia, but more generally, what matters are the logical attitudes of citizens (people in contexts citizens) around the world – especially in the era of the Internet, rapid information, contact and physical flows, ever new techniques, and the increasing multiplicity of various phenomena.
– [[This requires data and situations that are favorable to/for the development towards healthy, logically justified and definitionally* beneficial changes and actions]], and the so-called Russian society, at least officially, prefers to endure this totalitarian-authoritarian system with images about: „The great importance of Russia’s greatness as a geographically large, the strength and de facto perseverance of its citizens to endure the inconveniences that are intended to result in pushing aside and making competitors dependent. The image of borders or self-limitation becomes apparent only when one realizes that, for example, Putin: „Doesn’t limit Russia’s borders to maps, but claims that Russia is everywhere where the boot of a Russian soldier has been. There seems to be a persistent attitude in Russia, an image that: ultimately, Russia has no defined borders.(!) This approach probably paves the way or produces soldiers ready for any military expansion. Perhaps they subconsciously have the idea that ultimately all borders are relative and the only important thing is – from the sum of subliminal associations (this is how Putin raises children) – „Great Russia” and „Great, Holy Russia.” From the data perspective, Putin’s action(s) and approach are immoral (looking at the facts against civilization, against precedents of events regarding the category of progress regarding the continuity of humanity in the context of so-called humanism, which contains resources regarding relevant values, the quality of people’s lives, (from the rational-logical perspective (log.-def.*) and which, regarding both truth and law, logical law beneficial to people in accordance with their characteristics, nature, and possibilities of self-fulfillment and collective or common achievements,
„information-data (data – formulated content)” against the entire world, because in essence, cumulated within the scope of his aggressive-totalitarian attitude as a policy that in Russia can and semi-officially does state that so-called „respect” or respect for/against Russia is necessary not only from Russians.
The speed of possible changes that are qualitatively beneficial for people through the provision of basic data and with content that is simple in essence and truthful, beneficial for people, for humanity as a human species (or kind) – according to the author of this post – in the essential importance of information, data and taking actions by people, citizens [e.g. as new, innovative data ad truth – [ad „” for progress towards, the power of truth (log.-def.*), ad laws of beneficial (logical – definition*) – is certainly related to the power of influence on people, citizens, for people, for citizens (data provided by info, media, competently or significantly provided, provided data) and on civic platforms, university – academic, other specialist or senate – parliamentary, etc., at least ultimately ad meritum/merita of matters to be taken into account, and during the implementation, platforms, specialists with expertise (regarding various details), discussions, conversations should certainly count – and the author of this post (article) draws attention to the important The specific purpose of these actions, as a legitimate and owed objection to himself, as well as to other people, to the fact that people are being dominated by usurping, unfair, corrupt, fraudulent, or erroneous forces, and the significant changes, repairs, and reconstructions undertaken by people for corrective, restorative purposes, or at least as expressions (justifications) for the necessary changes.
2) – The Western world was somehow (yet) caught by surprise, and all Western attempts or maneuvers to influence the end of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine and its withdrawal from Ukraine proved ineffective.
3) – Biden’s actions from the side that despite defense and opposition to Putin’s (Russia’s) attack, but that Ukraine (democratic!) cannot defeat Russia, give food for thought, especially since his successor Trump started to take more drastic steps, namely instead of uniting/unifying and strengthening the forces of Western civilization and democracy and clearly using the context of Putin’s (and probably his promoters’) lawlessness in the international forum, also regarding fundamental human rights in general, which is an important and factual content, consistent with the truth, he started to break them up (when he put forward a demand to increase the NATO-defended potentials to the European parts, he received a positive reaction from the European part of NATO, but he himself began to become less and less credible in the next steps, and even treacherous regarding not only NATO as an alliance of self-defense of democracy, but democracy(!) with its logical principles and other details! His latest content of complaints to NATO allies about the lack of his assistance in the fight against Iran, despite the fact that he himself he ignored NATO in his independent attempt to solve problems with the aggressive, totalitarian-authoritarian Iran (or its usurper ruler/usurpator), breaking the „rational-communicative” alliance principle, which is also, in fact, an international one. [ Trump becomes a litigious authoritarian usurper if he considers himself the boss, the leader of democratic values and allied NATO countries or the so-called Western civilization, and the truth ad historia is that at least until Trump this civilization (European-American + Anglo-related ones, like Canada and Australia after all(!)- …***** >>>).
Trump started with talks with Putin, but he did not focus so much on the law, fundamental rights, but on juggling between categories: perhaps as a power (like balance or relationship), „diplomatic” and „beneficial” benefits regarding trade or management of raw materials with their profitability, but he bowed to the basic principles of the raison d’état of democracy, at least somehow betrayed the principles of friendship and democracy in the alliance (suddenly violently undermining the raison d’état of allied, democratically independent countries, authoritarian attempts to turn Canada or Greenland (which has the status of an autonomous part of the Danish kingdom) into Denmark by attacking Canada or Greenland, also trying to somehow persuade the alliance to the principles of democracy, and also as it is done with a plan: B, but this plan B was supposed to be (from Trump’s suggestions to the situation it looks clear that he preferred to somehow surrender, or even suggest that Ukraine surrender to Russia or give up part of Ukraine, rather than remain unambiguous IN DEFENSE THE VALUES OF DEMOCRACY and Ukraine’s right to full self-determination.
but also – currently (after talks with Putin), also Canada, Greenland, Denmark, Iran, with Trump ignoring NATO, Europe, indicate that Trump thinks it might make sense to create this system of three major forces, superpowers (USA, Russia, China) in the world. But – de facto – he is creating a separate trapdoor for Europe (with parts of NATO and the EU) and a separate one for the US (which would be large, but more solitary or commercial, but surrounded by a fast-paced world, etc., that changes daily, somehow evolving(!), but under the shadow of anti-freedom, libertine in essence, because usurping, hostile authoritarian-totalitarian forces (Putin or Xiao), which – (truth be told, logically – by definition*!) are enemies because they are against the rights of natural human freedom.
It seems that Trump has no plan, but is betting on authoritarianism in place of logical democracy and logically communicative reason, in fact, it does not place value on democracy, alliances and communication, but it schemes on its own, improvises (even if it manifests the nature of an „adventurous playboy” in the form of a „businessman”), being formally a representative of a democratic state, i.e. democracy (regardless of the category, that as a great republic) cannot – by virtue of systems, honesty – depreciate, undermine, weaken or violate the state or fact of existence that saves the factuality of the state of existence regarding the state of humanity, as an existing fact of democratic justice, nor equate the statuses of totalitarian-authoritarian regimes with those of free democracies.
GENERALLY, ONLY DEMOCRATIC LAW IS LOGICALLY (LOGICALLY – DEFINITIONALLY*) ABLE TO PROVIDE AND SECURE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS DUE TO HUMANS, PEOPLE, REGARDING THE CRITERIA OF TRUTH – as the author of this post demonstrates and presents in his study on law and rights beneficial to humans, universal to humans, humans as an entire human species (or genus).
Deficiencies in the law, falsehoods (ad logical conformity with the truth), i.e., either bypassing or omitting logical definitions, or inconsistencies with the truth (i.e., falsehood, inconsistency of the formulated content with logically correct definitions), are areas that need to be repaired, repaired even in so-called Democratic States, where not only the numerical majority counts, but also free elections consistent with reason and logic, consistent with the truth (it’s like a mathematical definition, but this scope cannot be ignored – of course!). Moreover – (!) regarding correctness of thinking, even the very term – the concept of democracy – is related to scope, i.e., the category of logic, this term is subject to criteria of truthfulness!
_____
He probably doesn’t want to count on Putin’s concessions differently than Europe sees it (through contestation and blockades against Russia), and totalitarians (Putin, Xiao, and others) certainly won’t be fooled by the fact that Trump is similar to them (and they – regarding the law). log.-def.*, however, they should not be allowed, as usurper-authoritarian totalitarianisms (ideologically, systemically), to enter into arrangements that can increase their influence over the entire world, and this at the expense of the fundamental rights logically due to people, which are connected with democracy, as logically, fundamentally related to equal rights, the right to freedom, or the determination of the innate or inherent dignity of every human being according to human law—and therefore its future shape!), and they know that democracy is their adversary or enemy(!).
_____
And then there is Africa, with its places of wild, mafia-populist-egotistic-clan-like „customs” or traditions, for example, in the form of forced circumcision of girls (a cruel and completely unjustified procedure under logical (log.-def.*) law), which are certainly not justified by any Jewish, religious, or religiosity customs of so-called circumcision of boys (not as drastic as ad female gender), but still de facto strangely interfering with the natural characteristics of the species, certainly not unambiguous ad praw i prawda regarding truth in the log.-def.* sense (compare the material from the author’s article – post entitled: „And if someone wants to free themselves…” (on his website – material ad prawda in the log.-def* sense).
_____
If after Putin’s (Russia’s) attack, which was a bandit and usurpatory-totalitarian – simply criminal – the forces of decay, mundane greed, etc., were to prevail, and NATO, the arm of free democracies, were to weaken, then in the event of Russia’s victory against Ukraine, then – [the writer is not sure whether an agreement guaranteeing the balance of power could be reached, because Putin is certainly not worth trusting, and behind Xiao’s smile there is an aggressive, ruthless totalitarianism devoid of respect for the lives of others, certainly for their rights, e.g. the right to live in individual freedom(!), and Trump, moreover, no longer appears as a credible representative of democracy or a democratic – currently China is also arming itself and doing everything for its production and securing trade routes, and for this totalitarian-authoritarian leader, and China is more important to them than anything else (supposedly the sum of the collective counts, but individually they are not free ad law log.-def.*, but if Trump focuses on the America (despite the existing alliance and the fact of existence) seeing this as a chance for „survival,” is already „lost, dead,” because democracy is the goal of law, rights, and concerns the foundations and methods consistent with the truth of the law—values or freedom—the nature of man, of people, as representatives (manifestations) of the human species (or kind), and should not tolerate authoritarian or totalitarian, usurping crime.
Democracy is an attribute of justice (ad law, truth log.-def.*), but not something exchangeable, something like: goods or land for freedom, or freedom for land or material gains. It is certainly not one of the attributes such as material prosperity or security itself.
Freedom can be and is an attribute of democracy, because these are basic features of human rights and natures, but democracy is not something inherently free, at least in the context of categories such as justice, if anti-democratic actions are taken within freedom.
We cannot count on (guarantee) that the greed and mundaneness of the West or bringing about conflicts, events such as Putin’s attack (with his Russia) on Ukraine, a de facto neighboring state and a separate nation, living peacefully and democratically, when the actual categories of truth count, especially regarding the statuses of those currently ruling in various countries (also important regarding the statuses of citizens of these various countries), that Putin will watch whether he will allow himself to be bribed if (since) he is guided by the thought that Ukraine is an illegal usurpation or an invention of corrupted Russians, even though Kyiv existed before Moscow was founded, and Russians adopted such a name, the term „Russians” to distinguish themselves from the Ruthenians who lived in Kyivan Rus’, distant and indirect even in terms of neighbors, also regarding the category of tribes, and Putin is trying to falsely cover it up, to deflect it with a lie, as if Kyiv was some offshoot of the already existing Russia or „Muscovites”.
Russia had periods of great power, vassals or subjects, but in today’s situation of history and politics, Russia has no right, no rights to attack lands recognized as Ukrainian or Ukrainians who, basically, after Kievan Rus’, have Ukrainian nationality, regardless of what Russians or other nationalities or states called them. Ukrainian history has had its share of historical ups and downs, but Ukrainians have established themselves in their territories in historical continuity, dating back to before Putin’s attack on an independent, democratic Ukraine that was logically recognized internationally. Regarding Crimea, the fact that Russia already has fairly extensive access to the Black Sea is certainly a factor, and Russia’s recapture of Crimea from Ukraine also seems to suggest that the Russians want to deny Ukrainians free access, even a view of the sea, by reclining on their neighboring „tourist loungers” that block out the sun after their bloody attacks on Ukrainians.
Marking: * From the study – post titled On Law and Rights in General…” (on the author’s website) – This article refers to the fact that the author of the text used the designated term with the intention of correcting the previously used term, in Marxism or simply during the times of the Polish People’s Republic, as a concept: false logic. This term (in Marxism) was meant to be the opposite of true logic, which was then understood as logically consistent with truth; its sentences and pronouncements were either true or false. However, the author takes into account here that, ultimately, logic cannot be false, i.e., inconsistent with truth, just as established factuality as truth cannot be false with respect to logic. A logical proposition is always about something, has a topic, and a proposition either based on facts or derived from beyond the facts. However, in such contexts, the author prefers to use a definition or distinction regarding the nature of such a logically constructed proposition, that is, distinguishing whether the proposition concerns real facts or is poetry, prose, fraud, or belongs to another category regarding the facts it indicates.
PS. The author of this article returns I’m reaching out to potential readers for financial support for the author and his website, as he lacks the resources to maintain and potentially develop his website. —– [Don’t skimp on a tenner] —–
April 7, 2026 author: Mariusz Milewski
______________
_____
[ /////Ad Validity –
– I) – Ad sharing, disseminating data Ad „Universal Law” (General, fundamental) for understanding the validity, benefits, and essence of this law (including what it is: for demos – kratos)
A – realizing this essential importance for people, implementing the repair of their own legal systems and forms, manifestations of organization and state, and equipment Ad public, service, etc. in accordance with the law due to people, logically consistent laws (log.-def.*) –
meaning universal, general law beneficial to all people and consistent with the nature of humans as a species and with truth, including the justification for its due validity [The author formulated the basis, scope, and justifications in the article: „On Law and Rights in General…” – available on the website CITIZENS SHOULD UNDERSTAND these principles; it is best to read them to understand the details, i.e., the truth, logic of scope, reservations (safeguards) against falsehood) – suitable like a logarithm for working out all details, serving – logically (log.-def.*) – regarding details (topically, in scope), when working out details (topics, „subjects of topics”).
-B – in addition to disseminating knowledge, the accumulation and collective action of a caliber to bring about beneficial changes in law and rights, as well as stimulating or facilitating the positive use of this law, for/in development.
Regarding the analysis of the situation:
1 – Usurper, evil forces – which threaten goodness, destroy it, which threaten the transformation of betterness into worseness, the transformation of goodness into evil. – I) – definitions of truth, important scopes, II) – how to prevent evil, how to endure it? – here, matters depend on: 1) people. /////]
______________